Harmonic Oscillator - Mass With Initial Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation for a harmonic oscillator with mass M and spring stiffness k, particularly when the mass has an initial velocity. The general solution is derived as x = A cos(ωt) + B sin(ωt), with ω defined as the square root of the force per unit displacement divided by mass. Initial conditions are applied, leading to the conclusion that A = 0 and B can be expressed in terms of the initial velocity, resulting in x = (v/ω) sin(ωt). The conversation also touches on the application of this model to bungee jumping, noting that while it can effectively model jumper behavior, factors like gravity and the non-ideal nature of bungee cords may complicate the analysis. Overall, the harmonic oscillator model provides a foundational understanding for similar dynamic systems.
Eugbug
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
For a harmonic oscillator with mass M, spring of stiffness k and displacement the force equation is:

-kx = Md2x/dt2

How do you handle the situation and work out a solution for x(t) when the mass has an initial velocity. E.g. a mass dropped onto the spring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a pretty simple second order differential equation with sins and coss as it's solutions, you then just solve for x'(0) = initial velocity
 
The first thing you do is to solve the DE in the general case, that is without specific initial conditions. You find
x = A cos \omegat + B sin \omegat

in which \omega = \frac{force per unit x}{mass}

and A and B are arbitrary constants. It is these whose values accommodate the initial conditions. So, suppose you knew that at t = 0, x = 0 and \frac{dx}{dt} = v_{0}.

Substituting x = 0, t = 0 into the general solution gives

x = B sin \omegat. [A = 0.]

So \frac{dx}{dt} = B \omega cos \omegat

Now imposing \frac{dx}{dt} = v_{0} when t = 0

v_{0} = B \omega so B =\frac{v}{\omega}

Putting in this value for B, we finally have

x = \frac{v}{\omega} sin \omegat.
 
Thanks for the answer Philip!

I was reading a question about Bungee ropes last night on Webanswers and this equation could probably go some way towards modeling the behavior of a jumper when they have reached the end of the rope which then starts to stretch.
 
Yes, it would be an excellent model. You've got to be careful over gravity, which displaces the equilibrium position below the point at which the bungee starts to stretch, but I doubt if this will cause too many problems for you.

And – not something to worry about yet – the bungee won't obey Hooke's law perfectly.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top