Harmonic Oscillator Negative Energy(Quantum)

Relativeee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok so the question is, is the state u(x) = Bxe^[(x^2)/2] an energy eigenstate of the system with V(x) = 1/2*K*X^2 and what is the probability per unit length of this state.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

So the way i did this was, to find if the state is an energy eigenstate of the system i checked to see if it satisfied the time independent Schrodinger equation. After all of the Calculations , came up with, 3- 2E/hw = 0, and the definition of E is E = (n+1/2)hw, so the only way for this solution to be satisfied is if the energy is negative, -2 to be exact. So with this I am pretty sure that this cannot be an energy eigenstate of the system since the harmonic oscillator has to have a positive energy(unless there is a specific exception i do not know about) and therefore we cannot find the probability density because the wave-function is not normalizable(blows up at inifinity) and that's what is bugging me, is it as simple as that or am i missing something, like for instance is there a way to normalize this wave-function so as to find the probability density?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Relativeee said:

The Attempt at a Solution

So the way i did this was, to find if the state is an energy eigenstate of the system i checked to see if it satisfied the time independent Schrodinger equation. After all of the Calculations , came up with, 3- 2E/hw = 0, and the definition of E is E = (n+1/2)hw, so the only way for this solution to be satisfied is if the energy is negative, -2 to be exact.
No it isn't. Try that again.
 
Relativeee said:
After all of the Calculations , came up with, 3- 2E/hw = 0, and the definition of E is E = (n+1/2)hw, so the only way for this solution to be satisfied is if the energy is negative, -2 to be exact.
That's not very exact. If 3 - 2 E/hbar*ω = 0 and you solve for E, what do you get? Hint: Move -2 E/hbar*ω over to the right side and change its sign.
 
Oh my goodness i apologize, i meant to put 3 + 2E/hw
 
So, given your definition of E, n must equal to -2. However, n has to be 0 or positive integer.
Does that mean this is the energy eigenstate of the system?
 
Relativeee said:
Oh my goodness i apologize, i meant to put 3 + 2E/hw
OK, in that case, we can perhaps help you if you show the work that led you to that expression.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top