Harmonic oscillator perturbation

Santiago Paz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator of frequency ω0:
H0 = 1/2m p2 + m/2 ω02 x2

Let the oscillator be in its ground state at t = 0, and be subject to the perturbation
Vˆ = 1/2 mω22 cos( ωt )at t > 0.

(a) Identify the single excited eigenstate of H0 for which the transition amplitude is nonzero in first-order time-dependent perturbation theory. Calculate this amplitude explicitly.
(b) Calculate the dominant term of the first-order transition probability to the state identified in (a) for ω = 2ω0. Give a condition for which this result becomes meaningless.

Homework Equations


H = H0 + V

The Attempt at a Solution


Used the above equation to start my solution
ended up with something in the form of

H = p2/2m + m/2 (ω02 + ω2cos( ωt )) x2

I am unsure as to how to keep going and find the eigenstates of H0. I thought it was more intuitive to solve for the eigenstates of H not H0. And I'm also not quite sure how to find the transition amplitude. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But you are not asked to find the eigenstates of H, you are asked to find out things in terms of the eigenstates of H0. In addition, the eigenstates of H are time dependent, which leads you to further complications. You only need to apply simple first order perturbation theory using the properties of the harmonic oscillator here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top