Harmonic Oscillator: Solving Newton's Second Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding Newton's Second Law in the context of a vertical mass damper system. The user grapples with the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration vectors, particularly noting that while the mass moves downward, the acceleration vector appears to point upward, indicating deceleration. Clarifications highlight that the acceleration vector indicates how the speed is changing, not the direction of movement itself, and that the velocity vector is always tangential to the motion. Examples, including circular motion, illustrate how acceleration can have components that do not directly align with the direction of movement. The conversation concludes with a better understanding of the dynamics involved and the distinction between acceleration and movement direction.
induing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hello,

new here and confused about Newton second Law.

given:
vertical mass damper system, position of the mass: x(t)=sin(t)
velocity is: v(t)=cos(t)
acceleration is: a(t)=-sin(t)

function x(t): above x-axis describes position of the mass below the vertical equilibrium point, which (below) is the positive direction of vector x


suppose I look at the movement between t=0 and t=T/4: when the mass is below the vertical equilibrium line and is moving to the ground

when I apply Newton second law (ma(t)) the vector a(t) must point downward because mass is going down, but when I look at the the function a(t) is it negative, which means the vector a(t) is pointing upward (ponting in negative direction)...

I'm off the right track, but don't see my fault..

so if anyone can help, please?

grtz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand this correctly, the acceleration vector should point upwards because, on the way down, the mass is approaching its lowest position and will have zero velocity there. This upward acceleration vector provides the necessary deceleration of the mass. The velocity vector points downward, however.
 
so the term (ma(t)) isn't the vector which is related to the movement of the mass?

i find that rather weird, because ma(t) equals the vector sum of all the (external) forces, so i would pressume that this net force gives the direction...

and if I do understand this correctly, I cannot predict the movement of the mass just by looking at the acceleration vector?

thank you for reply!
grtz
 
The movement of a body is generally represented by the velocity vector, which is always tangential to the motion. For example, if a car was traveling eastwards, the velocity vector would point eastwards.

The acceleration vector, however, acts in the direction opposite to motion if the object is slowing down. In the above example, if the car was traveling eastwards and slowed down to turn a corner,say, the velocity vector points eastwards, but the acceleration vector points westwards. We say the car has a negative acceleration (in my first post deceleration should be replaced with negative acceleration to be more precise). However, in accelerating a car, for example, the velocity and acceleration vectors do point in the same direction. (net force on car is in this direction). \sum F_x = ma_x
 
thanks for the clear and brief explanation!
must have been very confused: force which is needed to give a body certain amount of movement, is indeed the thing which control way the way the body change it's movement

more friction will slow it down down, so decceleration kicks in, but body off course is still moving some time in the same direction.

thank you big time,sir!
grtz
 
Perhaps to give another example, have you ever looked at circular motion? The velocity vector is always tangent to the circle if a body is undergoing circular motion. But the acceleration vector can be in quite unexpected places. If there is no tangential acceleration (that is, constant velocity and uniform circular motion) then the acceleration vector is radially inwards (the body experiences a centripetal acceleration). However, if there is a tangential acceleration, the resultant acceleration vector is the vector sum of the centripetal acc. and tangential acc. and we get a vector that is slightly offset from being directed exactly towards the centre of the circle.
 
yeah I know the dynamics of circular motion, constant velocity or accelerated
the normal (radial) component is needed to change movement of direction and is always presented

if you want a accelerated circular movement (speeding up in a curved road) the tangential vector which produces change in velocity kicks in

acceleration vector then consists of 2 vector.

have been confused with force direction as being the direction of the acceration vector, which just indicates the way the speed is changing an not the movement itself

soon examination of dynamics,
so many thanks again for the quick reply!

grtz
 
Back
Top