Having trouble linearizing an equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hedgehog1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearizing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of linearizing the equation for measuring the charge-to-mass ratio of electrons (e/m) and the ambient magnetic field (BE). The user has derived an equation but seeks a more effective linearization method. The current equation is expressed as BH = [(2vm/e)^(1/2)] * (1/r) + BE, which the user believes could be simplified further. A cautionary note is provided regarding the clarity of written fractions to avoid ambiguity in interpretation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear mathematical representation in problem-solving.
Hedgehog1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The goal of my lab was to measure the ratio of charge to mass for electrons (e/m) and the approximate ambient magnetic field of the Earth (BE). I have come up with what is the required equation (my TA confirmed this) but I am having trouble linearizing it.

y=mx+b
y=(e/m)x+BE

While the answer I have would work, I can't help but feel that there is a better way to linearize this equation. Any help would be appreciated.

Homework Equations



e/m=2v/[(BH-BE)^2]*r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



e*(BH-BE)^2/m=2v/r^2

(BH-BE)^2=2vm/er^2

BH-BE= (2vm/er^2)^1/2

BH=[(2vm/er^2)^1/2] +BE

BH=[(2vm/e)^1/2]*1/r +BE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to solve that equation for BH, there is no possible other result (apart from more complicated ways to write the same thing).

Be careful with written fractions - 1/ab is ambiguous. A computer would interpret it as (1/a)*b, and some human readers get confused. If you mean 1/(ab), the brackets are important.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top