Having Trouble With Dipole Torque and Work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque and work associated with a dipole in an electric field. The dipole moment is given as 2.5 nC·m, and the electric field strength is 3.6 MN/C, with the dipole oriented at 33 degrees. The user struggles with the torque calculation using the equation T = pE sin(theta) and misinterprets unit conversions, leading to incorrect results. For the work required to rotate the dipole to an antiparallel position, the user applies W = -pEcos(theta) but needs to consider the change in potential energy to find the correct work value. Clarification on unit conversions and the distinction between torque and potential energy is essential for accurate calculations.
ccelt09
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
There is a two part problem that I'm struggling with.

1) A dipole with a moment of 2.5 nC . m is oriented 33 degrees from a field with strength 3.6 MN/C.

What is the magnitude of the torque on the dipole? ____ mN . m

I know the equation T = qd x E sin (theta) where qd is the given dipole moment, but even with converting and plugging in I don't get the right answer.

2)How much work is required to rotate the dipole until it's antiparallel to the field?

again i tried plugging into -pEcos(theta) but my answer is wrong.I am not quite sure why my approach isn't working or what I am doing wrong. I would greatly appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show what you did so we can see what went wrong.
 
I used the equation torque = dipole magnitude x E. the dipole came in units 2.5 nC . m, the field as 3.6 MN/C. I took the n to represent nano ^ -9 and M as Mega ^ 6. I did the appropriate conversions to have the product of the two come in units mN.m in which the program wants the answer.

2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 N/C = 9x10^12 mN.m

2.5 nC x 10^6 to get to 2.5 mC . m and 3.6MN/C x 10^6 to get N/C. I feel that was probably a misinterpretation of what the units represent.

For the second part in order to find the work necessary to make the dipole antiparallel to the field i used W=-pEcos(theta)

-2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 cos(57) = -4.9x10^12 ; already angled at 33 degrees, 57+33=90 = antiparallel/perpendicular
 
ccelt09 said:
I used the equation torque = dipole magnitude x E. the dipole came in units 2.5 nC . m, the field as 3.6 MN/C. I took the n to represent nano ^ -9 and M as Mega ^ 6. I did the appropriate conversions to have the product of the two come in units mN.m in which the program wants the answer.

2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 N/C = 9x10^12 mN.m

2.5 nC x 10^6 to get to 2.5 mC . m and 3.6MN/C x 10^6 to get N/C. I feel that was probably a misinterpretation of what the units represent.
You're messing up the units a bit:
2.5 nC . m = 2.5x10-6 mC.m (not 2.5x10+6).

For the second part in order to find the work necessary to make the dipole antiparallel to the field i used W=-pEcos(theta)

-2.5x10^6 mC.m x 3.6x10^6 cos(57) = -4.9x10^12 ; already angled at 33 degrees, 57+33=90 = antiparallel/perpendicular
That equation tells you the potential energy, U = -pEcos(theta). To find the work, figure out the change in PE.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top