Having trouble with Pulleys and FBD's(not homework)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevo11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
Understanding pulleys and Free Body Diagrams (FBDs) can be challenging, particularly when it comes to deriving formulas for systems like Atwood's machine. The discussion highlights confusion around the teacher's explanations and the need for clearer resources. A helpful link to a detailed analysis of Atwood's machine was shared, which aided in grasping the concepts better. Participants suggest reviewing textbook problems and seeking specific help in dedicated forums when stuck. Overall, utilizing available resources and community support can enhance understanding of these physics topics.
Stevo11
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So up until now I have understood physics but we're on Pulleys now and the Free body diagrams are baffling me... My teacher just manages to pull formulae from his behinde and I can't seem to figure out how he derives them... like for acceleration of two objects suspended vertically from a pulley etc...

I don't really know how to explain the root of my issue here but if anyone has a good link to pulleys and FBD's I would be very greatful as I have looked lol.


*yes I realize I just spelled Home work wrong, sorry its been a long day
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a link analyzing Atwood's machine, one of the standard pulley arrangements: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/atwd.html#c1".

My recommendation is to read your text and try to solve the problems there. When you get stuck, post the problem and your work in the Intro Physics section and someone will be able to give you specific help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ok thanks a lot, I did read the textbook lol, but that link did help me a lot with two objects suspended from a pulley both vertically :smile:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top