Head loss equaling head pressure?

AI Thread Summary
When head losses in a pipe equal the head pressure, the flow rate remains constant. Pressure loss in a pipe typically occurs when there is fluid movement, with losses being proportional to the square of the fluid velocity. A pressure drop of 10 meters of water head indicates a specific flow velocity for that pipe. Understanding this relationship is crucial for effective fluid dynamics management. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing how head pressure and head loss interact in pipeline systems.
KrisOhn
Messages
195
Reaction score
2
If you had a fluid in a pipe, with say, 10m of head pressure, what would happen when the head losses of the pipe equaled the head pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas? Maybe a moderator could move this to a more appropriate forum if necessary?
 
I believe you get a constant flow rate.

You normally only get a pressure loss in a pipe when there is some flow (As I recall pressure loss is roughly proportional to fluid velocity squared). So a pressure drop of 10m head of water would occur at some velocity of water specific to that pipe.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top