What is the difference between Cp and Cv for an ideal gas?

AI Thread Summary
Cv is appropriate for calculating the change in internal energy of an ideal gas, as it depends solely on temperature, regardless of volume changes. Cp is relevant for processes at constant pressure and is used to determine heat transfer in those scenarios. The distinction between Cp and Cv is crucial for thermodynamic calculations, particularly in heat engines. The ratio of Cp to Cv, known as gamma, is significant in understanding the behavior of gases. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate thermodynamic analysis.
sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
I'm just checking that it's okay to use Cv all the time as a heat capacity of an ideal gas, even when the volume's not constant. This is because the average energy per molecule is 3/2*Kb*T from kinetic theory, therefore the average energy per mole is equal to 3RT/2 = CvT etc.
I'm currently doing a calculation for a heat engine and I'm working out the change in internal energy at a constant volume and I need to make sure that we use Cv and not Cp as the heat capacity.
Also, what is the significance of Cp if it's not used? Is it just so that we can set gamma=Cp/Cv?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The heat capacity C of a substance is the amount of heat required to change its temperature by one degree.

So, in your thermodynamic processes, the value of the heat capacity depends on the path chosen.

That is why you have heat capacites at constant pressure(Cp) and constant volume(Cv) .

Now, for an ideal gas, the change in internal energy for any process depends on the temperature only and the relation is given by \Delta U = nC_v \Delta T.
That is why in most of the problems you are doing(which involves ideal gases), you are using C_v to calculate the change in internal energy.

Did that help?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top