Heat capacity of water -- experimental determination

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involves cooling water below freezing and then measuring the time taken to warm it back to various temperatures. The observations indicate that heat transfer increases the temperature of ice until it reaches 0ºC, where it remains until all ice melts, demonstrating a phase change. The heat capacities of ice and liquid water can be compared, but absolute values cannot be determined from the data provided. The relationship between time and temperature change is linear, allowing for the calculation of ratios between heat capacities and latent heat. Ultimately, while the experiment yields useful ratios, it does not allow for the determination of absolute heat capacities.
sunquick
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A quantity of water in a beaker of negligible thermal capacity is cooled to a few degrees below freezing point. The beaker is then placed in a warm room, and the times recorded at which it is at various temperatures as it gradually warms. The observations were:

temperature/ºC time/min:
-3.0 0
-2.0 0.93
-1.0 1.89
0 2.92
...
0 169.72
1.0 171.84
2.0 174.04
3.0 176.34

Homework Equations


Q=C \Delta T
Q= L
Q= P \Delta t

The Attempt at a Solution



My question concerns part b)
I assume the power delivered to the system is constant.
So Q=C \Delta T = P \Delta t or
\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta T} = C/P = const

So I fit a straight line to the experimental points to determine the slope and so to know C/P.
There will be two heat capacities, one for ice and the other for liquid water. I can determine the ratio o C_ice / C_water, and also of the latent heat necessary to melt the ice by noting that

P \frac{\Delta t_1}{\Delta T} = C
P \Delta t_2 = L
\Delta t_2 \frac{\Delta T}{\Delta t_1} = L / C

I can find the heat capacities and latent heats with respect to one another, but I can't seem to know how find one of them in "absolute terms". My question is if that is possible, and what other quantitative results can be obtained from the observations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please state exactly what the question asks for.
 
Sorry I forgot tho type that part of the problem:

a) Explain the general form of the experimental results.
b) What quantitative results can you deduce from the observations?

For part a) I have to explain that heat is transferred to the ice, increasing its temperature, till it reaches 0ºC. Then it stays at that temperature until all the ice has melted away, because all the heat entering the system is going into changing the phase of the water instead of increasing its temperature. Once the ice has melted, the temperature rises again, this time at a different rate than before because water has a different specific heat capacity than ice.
 
sunquick said:
Sorry I forgot tho type that part of the problem:

a) Explain the general form of the experimental results.
b) What quantitative results can you deduce from the observations?

For part a) I have to explain that heat is transferred to the ice, increasing its temperature, till it reaches 0ºC. Then it stays at that temperature until all the ice has melted away, because all the heat entering the system is going into changing the phase of the water instead of increasing its temperature. Once the ice has melted, the temperature rises again, this time at a different rate than before because water has a different specific heat capacity than ice.
Then I think you are finished. As you say, you cannot determine the heat capacities of the water sample in its different phases, let alone the capacities per unit mass. All you can provide is the ratios between them.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top