Heat transfer and combustion correlations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the simplification of a heat transfer correlation for natural convection from a horizontal pipe to the atmosphere. Participants explore the relationship between Nusselt number (Nu), Grashof number (Gr), and Prandtl number (Pr), and how to derive the heat transfer coefficient (h). There is confusion regarding the algebraic manipulation of the terms, particularly how to handle the powers of d and the constants involved. The importance of unit consistency and the correct application of algebraic principles is emphasized throughout the conversation. Ultimately, the participants express a collaborative effort to clarify the calculations and arrive at the correct solution.
Mitch1
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Hi am a bit stuck on understanding how these two correlations can be similar I am wondering if anyone can ahead any light
Can anyone solve

Correlation for heat transfer by natural convection from a horizontal pipe to atmosphere is;

Nu = 0.53Gr^0.25Pr^0.25
Nu = hd / k

Where, Gr = αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g / μ²
And Pr = Cpμ / k

Show that the above correlation can be simplified to;
h ≈ 1.34 (Ts-Tf / d)^0.25

α=3.077 x 10^-3
ρ=1.086
Cp=1.0063
k=2.816 x 10^-5
μ=1.962 x 10^-5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mitch1 said:
Nu = 0.53Gr^0.25Pr^0.25
Nu = hd / k

Where, Gr = αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g / μ²
And Pr = Cpμ / k
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##
Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants, and you should get an answer similar to
##a \left( \frac{(Ts-Tf)}{d}\right)^{.25}##
 
Note: When I carried out the calculation, I did not get 1.34 as a coefficient. You may want to verify all you units to make sure they are balanced.
 
RUber said:
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##
Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants, and you should get an answer similar to
##a \left( \frac{(Ts-Tf)}{d}\right)^{.25}##

Hi ruber
Thanks for your reply!
All units are correct as stated I am also unsure how to get 1.34 I have tried various ways.
When I follow your advise how would d^3 disappear in a sense as this is a unknown
Thanks again
 
The ##d^3 ## doesn't disappear, you have ##\frac{(d^3)^{.25}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{.25}}##.
What is g? That constant was not given in your original post.
 
RUber said:
The ##d^3 ## doesn't disappear, you have ##\frac{(d^3)^{.25}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{.25}}##.
What is g? That constant was not given in your original post.
I unstandard that now thanks a lot!
And g is 9.81 it is just gravity
 
did you try:

(d^4)/d

I`m working on same question.
 
blitzman said:
did you try:

(d^4)/d

I`m working on same question.
Hi, would that not result in d^3
 
Anyone get any further with this question? Its really becoming a bug bear of mine I can't seem to get it any further along...
 
  • #10
Big Jock said:
Anyone get any further with this question? Its really becoming a bug bear of mine I can't seem to get it any further along...
RUber gave the solution essentially completely in post #2. I don't see what the problem is.

Chet
 
  • #11
your 100% correct Chet I have got the correct answer my post was in haste
 
  • #12
Big Jock said:
your 100% correct Chet I have got the correct answer my post was in haste
Hi again I have completed this question however I am unsure how we get from
(D^3)^.25 /d. = (1/d^.25)
 
  • #13
Mitch1 said:
Hi again I have completed this question however I am unsure how we get from
(D^3)^.25 /d. = (1/d^.25)
It's just basic algebra.

\frac{(d^3)^{0.25}}{d}=\frac{d^{0.75}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{0.25}}
Chet
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
It's just basic algebra.

\frac{(d^3)^{0.25}}{d}=\frac{d^{0.75}}{d}=\frac{1}{d^{0.25}}
Chet
Hi Chet
Yes I realized once I posted it
Thanks anyway
 
  • #15
Am I allowed to ask what "Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants" means for mere mortals struggling along. Or is that too much of an embarrassing admission?
 
  • #16
rjc45y said:
Am I allowed to ask what "Distribute through the exponents across multiplication, and compute the constants" means for mere mortals struggling along. Or is that too much of an embarrassing admission?
What I meant by "distribute through across multiplication" was:
##(ab^2c^a)^x = a^x b^{2x} c^{ax}##
Then, combine all your like terms.
 
  • #17
Many thanks, got the correct answer but at the mo' it's x10^-3 out, will preserver
 
  • #18
RUber said:
Plug in the information:
## Nu = 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} = hd / k ##
##h = \frac{k}{d} 0.53(\frac{αρ²d³(Ts-Tf)g}{ μ²})^{0.25}(\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} ##

I am having trouble getting my head round this problem. I think I am trying to do to much to quickly and confusing the numbers when I multiply out the equation.
Am I on the right line to multiply by μ² 1st? before I distribute through across multiplication?
For (\frac{Cpμ }{ k})^{0.25} I have got to = 0.915.
 
  • #19
Yes you are correct on both counts
 
  • #20
Do I need to multiply 0.915 that I found by μ2? and also 0.53 by μ2
 
  • #21
I am not sure what you are trying to do? Your 0.915 is essentially Pr but you can just plug the values into the equation you quoted in post #18
 
  • #22
Try working out the nusselt number with the values given and 0.915 you worked out.
Once you have nu you can then put this into the heat transfer coefficient equation
 
  • #23
NU = 47.55(d3(Ts-Tf))

Does that look close?
 
  • #24
Yes that looks correct but there needs to be a power of 0.25 at the end of your equation
 
  • #25
I missed that by mistake sorry.

Your help has been great and really got me past my mental block. I am 10-3 out but should I have used k in W not kW?
 
  • #26
Your thermal conductivity is given in kW m-1 k-1 this will give your answer x10-3 kW m-2 k-2 which when you covert to W you get your answer
 
  • #27
Apologies for the old thread resurrection but I can't get to grips with this.

I've tried it my long complicated way and the way suggested above and am struggling solving the equation.

Once I've punched in the numbers I end up with:

h=((1.49248x10^-5)/d)x((0.43433xd^0.75x(Ts-Tf))/0.0044) x0.915Please can someone come to my rescue?
 
  • #28
It's like the 0.0044 is in my way which was formerly (u^2)^0.25
 
  • #29
Rogue said:
Apologies for the old thread resurrection but I can't get to grips with this.

I've tried it my long complicated way and the way suggested above and am struggling solving the equation.

Once I've punched in the numbers I end up with:

h=((1.49248x10^-5)/d)x((0.43433xd^0.75x(Ts-Tf))/0.0044) x0.915Please can someone come to my rescue?
Any chance you can write this out using LaTex. https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

And please express your results first in terms of algebraic parameters, and then show how you substituted. I would like to see your whole derivation.
 
  • #30
My algebraic expression:

##h= \frac {k}{d} 0.53 ( \frac { \alpha p^2 d^3 (T_s - T_f) g} {u^2})^{0.25} (\frac {Cpu}{k})^{0.25}##
 
  • #31
Chestermiller said:
Any chance you can write this out using LaTex. https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/

And please express your results first in terms of algebraic parameters, and then show how you substituted. I would like to see your whole derivation.

Is the above ok?
 
  • #32
##h= \frac {2.816 \times 10^-5}{d} 0.53 ( \frac { (3.077 \times 10^-3) 1.086^2 d^3 (T_s - T_f) 9.81} {(1.962 \times 10^-5)^2})^{0.25} (0.915)##

The 0.915 at the end is my calculated Pr number to the power of 0.25.
 
  • #33
Rogue said:
##h= \frac {2.816 \times 10^-5}{d} 0.53 ( \frac { (3.077 \times 10^-3) 1.086^2 d^3 (T_s - T_f) 9.81} {(1.962 \times 10^-5)^2})^{0.25} (0.915)##

The 0.915 at the end is my calculated Pr number to the power of 0.25.
So, what is the problem?
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
So, what is the problem?

I realize it's probably going to be something daft, and I've done the hard part (hopefully), but I just can't seem to progress it from here?
 
  • #35
##0.0044h= \frac {(2.816\times 10^-5)}{d} 0.53 (0.2355 \times 1.0421 d^{0.75}(T_s - T_f)^{0.25} 1.7698 ) (0.915)##

Would this be a step in the right direction?
 
  • #36
Rogue said:
##0.0044h= \frac {(2.816\times 10^-5)}{d} 0.53 (0.2355 \times 1.0421 d^{0.75}(T_s - T_f)^{0.25} 1.7698 ) (0.915)##

Would this be a step in the right direction?
Yes. This is basic high school algebra.
 
  • #37
Chestermiller said:
Yes. This is basic high school algebra.

Bit harsh there Chet, but thanks.
I had just solved this, guess I need to try keep thinking straightforward rather than over complicating it. :)
 
  • #38
Rogue said:
Bit harsh there Chet, but thanks.
I had just solved this, guess I need to try keep thinking straightforward rather than over complicating it. :)
Sorry. I didn't mean to be harsh. I was just helping my grandson study for the SATs yesterday, and this kind of exponential algebra was one of the things the study guide touched upon.
 
  • #39
Chestermiller said:
Sorry. I didn't mean to be harsh. I was just helping my grandson study for the SATs yesterday, and this kind of exponential algebra was one of the things the study guide touched upon.
No worries.
 
Back
Top