Heating 5.0dl of Coffee Water: How long does it take?

AI Thread Summary
To heat 5.0 dl of water from an initial temperature of 14 °C using a 650 W coffee maker with 92% efficiency, the total energy required is calculated to be 31880.43 J. The effective energy input from the coffee maker, considering its efficiency, is necessary to determine the heating time. The time taken to heat the water is approximately 49.04 seconds. The discussion emphasizes that the formula P = Q/t is not applicable here due to the coffee maker's inefficiency, which means not all produced energy contributes to heating the water. The calculations confirm that understanding efficiency is crucial for accurate time estimation in heating processes.
chawki
Messages
504
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Coffee maker, whose output of 650 W, producing coffee. Kettle to the boil 5.0 dl of water, with an initial temperature of 14 ° C. Heat capacity of water is 4.19 kJ / (kg ° C) and water density of 1.0 kg/dm3

Homework Equations


How long does it take a coffee water heating, if the stove efficiency is 92%?

The Attempt at a Solution


m=0.5kg
Cp=4.19kj/kg*C
density of water=1000kg/m3
P=650Watt

efficiency=92%=0.92
Q/E=0.92
E=Q/0.92

Q=m*Cp*delta T
Q=0.5*4.19*14
Q=29.33Kj

E=Q/0.92
E=29330/0.92
E=31880.43 J

P=E/t (why here we don't use P=Q/t)
t=E/P
t=31880.43/650
t=49.04 s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chawki said:
E=Q/0.92
E=29330/0.92
E=31880.43 J

P=E/t (why here we don't use P=Q/t)
t=E/P
t=31880.43/650
t=49.04 s

You don't use P = Q/t because the coffee maker is not 100% efficient. Q is the joules required to raise the temperature of the water to the required point, but the energy E being generated by the stove is not all going into the water, some of it is escaping elsewhere. Even so, it's the energy that the stove produces that you need to 'meter' for time.

You worked out that the stove needs to produce E joules in order for amount Q of it to end up in the water.
 
Ah now i get it...so when they don't give E, it's probably because the stove is 100% efficient and thus E=Q !
 
Is my answer correct?
 
I didn't do the math, but the method looks fine.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top