Heavily Damped Simple Harmonic System - How To Start?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem related to a heavily damped simple harmonic system. The key expression for displacement is given, and participants suggest starting with the differential equation of the damped harmonic oscillator. The solution involves calculating the first and second derivatives of displacement and substituting them into the equation. A specific condition for initial velocity, due to the system being released from rest, is highlighted, leading to a crucial relationship between the constants involved. The conversation concludes with a participant confirming that the approach discussed successfully resolved their query.
phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A heavily damped simple harmonic system is displaced a distance F from its equilibrium positio and released from rest. Show that in the expression for the displacement

x=e^{-pt}(F\cosh qt + G\sinh qt)

where

p=\frac{r}{2m}

and

q=(\frac{r^2}{4m^2}-\frac{s}{m})^{\frac{1}{2}}

that the ratio

\frac{G}{F}=\frac{r}{(r^2-4ms)^{\frac{1}{2}}}


2. The attempt at a solution

I've been thinking and thinking and thinking, but no luck. I'd really appreciate it if someone could just tell me where to start.

Thanks!
phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi phyz,

the differential equation of the damped harmonic oscillator is probably a good place to start...
 
Hi lanedance!

You mean I should simply calculate xdot and xddot and plug them into

m\ddot{x}+r\dot{x}+sx=0

?

Let me give it a go :smile:
 
Last edited:
x'(t)= -pe^{-pt}(F\cosh qt+ G\sinh qt)+ e^{-pt}(qF\sinh qt+ qG\cosh qt)

Since it is released from rest, we have
x'(0)=-pF+ qG= 0
That should be enough.
 
HallsofIvy said:
x'(t)= -pe^{-pt}(F\cosh qt+ G\sinh qt)+ e^{-pt}(qF\sinh qt+ qG\cosh qt)

Since it is released from rest, we have
x'(0)=-pF+ qG= 0
That should be enough.

Thank you! That did the trick :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top