Height and Acceleration of a Satellite in Orbit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations related to the height and acceleration of a satellite in orbit, focusing on gravitational force and centripetal acceleration. The subject area includes gravitational physics and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the height of a satellite using gravitational equations but questions the validity of their results and the equations used. They also explore the relationship between gravitational force and centripetal acceleration, expressing confusion about the direction of acceleration in circular motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations and assumptions. Some provide insights into the nature of acceleration as a vector and its direction in uniform circular motion. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between gravitational force and satellite height, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the provided gravitational force is significantly less than Earth's surface gravity, which influences their interpretations of the satellite's height and acceleration. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the implications of the equations used and the assumptions made regarding satellite orbits.

benca
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A satellite is designed to orbit earth at an altitude above its surface that will place it in a gravitational field with a strength of 4.5 N/Kg

a) Calculate the distance above the surface of the earth at which the satellite must orbit

b) Assuming the orbit is circular, calculate the acceleration of the satellite and its direction

c) at what speed must the satellite travel in order to maintain this orbit?
Relevant Equations
Eg = Gme/r^2

me = mass of the earth
a)

Eg = Gme/r^2
r = √Gme/Eg
r = √[(6.67x10^-11 N*m^2*kg^2)(5.98x10^24 kg)]/(4.5 N/kg)
r = 9.41x10^6 m

h = r2 - r1
h = 9.41x10^6 m - 6.38x10^6 m
h = 3.03x10^6 m

that's over 3000 km. Did I not use for right equation? Is Eg not 4.5 N/kg?

Also for b), isn't the force of gravity the centripetal acceleration? so wouldn't it be the same equation? ac = Gme/r^2

and I don't know what it means by direction. isn't it accelerating in a circular motion? This one has really got me confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
benca said:
that's over 3000 km. Did I not use for right equation? Is Eg not 4.5 N/kg?

Also for b), isn't the force of gravity the centripetal acceleration? so wouldn't it be the same equation? ac = Gme/r^2

and I don't know what it means by direction. isn't it accelerating in a circular motion? This one has really got me confused.

Why do you think over 3000km is wrong?

Acceletration is a vector, and has a direction. What is the directioin for uniform circular motion?
 
PeroK said:
Why do you think over 3000km is wrong?

Acceletration is a vector, and has a direction. What is the directioin for uniform circular motion?

Well in examples provided the satellites were much less. I guess I thought it should have been similar. And now that I say it, the direction of acceleration is towards the centre of the Earth (?)
 
benca said:
Well in examples provided the satellites were much less. I guess I thought it should have been similar. And now that I say it, the direction of acceleration is towards the centre of the Earth (?)
Yes. That's what "centripetal" means.

By the way, you can get the radius by noticing that the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. So:

##\frac{r^2}{R^2} = \frac{g_R}{g_r}##

The force you were given was just under half the Earth's surface gravity, so ##r \approx 1.5 R##. ##R \approx 6,000km##, so ##h \approx 3,000 km## looks about right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K