Height of Hill with Potential and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
To find the height of the hill, the conservation of energy principle is applied, where the potential energy (PE) at the top equals the kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom. The KE at the bottom is calculated as 3600 J using the formula KE = 1/2 mv^2. At the top, the KE is 0 since the sled starts from rest, and the potential energy is expressed as PE = mgh. By setting the equations equal, the height (H) is derived as 7.35 meters. The discussion clarifies that the potential energy at the bottom is zero, serving as a reference point for calculations.
Dirst
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child and sled with a combined mass of 50.0 kg slide down a frictionless hill. If the sled starts from rest and has a speed of 12.0 m/s at the bottom, what is the height of the hill?


Homework Equations


KE = 1/2 m v^2
PE = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


KE = 1/2 (50.0) (12.0^2)
KE = 3600 N

No idea what to do. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much potential/kinetic energy do you have at the top of the hill?

How much potential/kinetic energy do you have at the bottom of the hill?

Remember, energy is conserved.

Kt + Pt = Kb + Pb
 
Well at the top:

KE = 1/2*(50.0)*(0)
KE = 0 N

PE = (50.0)*(9.8)*H <-- Need to find this... So I guess I can't do PE.

Bottom:

KE = 1/2*(50.0)*(12.0^2)
KE = 3600 N

Again, you can't do PE because you don't know H...
 
You were able to find the correct kinetic energy at the bottom and top of the hill. (It's in Joules, not Newtons). Energy is conserved throughout the intial and final states.

mgh + 0 = 3600J + 0,

Solve h.
 
According to that,

H = 3600 J / ((9.8 m/s^2)*(50.0 kg))
H = 7.35 m

Is Pb = 0 because the height would equal 0 m?
 
This is right, it is just defined as a zero point for calculation purposes. The real zero would be at the Earth's center of course.
 
Thank you both. On to my next problem... :(
 
Back
Top