Heisenberg Equations of Motion, Solving for S(t) in Spin Precession problem

logic smogic
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Problem
Consider the spin precession problem in the Heisenberg picture. Using the Hamiltonian

H=-\omega S_{z}

where
\omega=\frac{eB}{mc}

write the Heisenberg equations of motion for the time dependent operators S_{x}(t), S_{y}(t), and S_{z}(t). Solve them to obtain \vec{S} as a function of t.

Formulae

\frac{d A_{H}}{dt}=\frac{1}{\imath \hbar}[A_{H}, H]

A_{H}=U^{\dagger}A_{S}U

U=e^{\frac{-\imath H t}{\hbar}}

Attempt
Well, computing the Heisenberg equations is pretty straitforward:

\frac{d S_{x}}{dt}=\frac{1}{\imath \hbar}[S_{x}, -\omega S_{z}]<br /> =-\frac{\omega}{\imath \hbar}[S_{x},S_{z}]<br /> =\omega S_{y}

\frac{d S_{y}}{dt}=\frac{1}{\imath \hbar}[S_{y}, -\omega S_{z}]<br /> =-\frac{\omega}{\imath \hbar}[S_{y},S_{z}]<br /> =-\omega S_{x}

\frac{d S_{z}}{dt}=\frac{1}{\imath \hbar}[S_{z}, -\omega S_{z}]<br /> =-\frac{\omega}{\imath \hbar}[S_{z},S_{z}]<br /> =0

But when it comes to solving for a function of t, I’m stuck with extra constants. My method here is to differentiate S_{x} twice, and then solve the resulting differential equation.

\frac{d^{2}S_{x}}{dt^{2}}=-\omega^{2} S_{x}

S_{x} = C_{1} e^{\imath \omega t}+C_{2} e^{-\imath \omega t}

What “initial/boundary conditions” do I use to determine the two constants above? Normalization of some sort?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Normalization isn't the issue. Since initial conditions aren't specified, you should take them to just be Si(0) (i=x,y,z), so that C1+C2=Sx(0). Can you see how to get C1-C2 from what you have so far?
 
I'm not quite sure.

I know of S_{x} as,

S_{x} = \frac{\hbar}{2} \sigma_{x}

...but I'm not sure how that helps, considering both C's are complex coefficients, not operators, matrices, or vectors. At t=0, would S_x have any value at all, wouldn't it be zero considering the Hamiltonian? I was never really comfortable with spin...

If S_{x}(t=0) = 0, then I suppose...
C_{1} =-C_{2}
And perhaps we could set C_1 equal to 1 or hbar/2?
 
logic smogic said:
Attempt
Well, computing the Heisenberg equations is pretty straitforward:

\frac{d S_{x}}{dt}=\frac{1}{\imath \hbar}[S_{x}, -\omega S_{z}]<br /> =-\frac{\omega}{\imath \hbar}[S_{x},S_{z}]<br /> =\omega S_{y}...(1)


But when it comes to solving for a function of t, I’m stuck with extra constants. My method here is to differentiate S_{x} twice, and then solve the resulting differential equation.

\frac{d^{2}S_{x}}{dt^{2}}=-\omega^{2} S_{x}

S_{x} = C_{1} e^{\omega t}+C_{2} e^{-\omega t}...(2)

What “initial/boundary conditions” do I use to determine the two constants above? Normalization of some sort?

I think your eq. (2) should read

S_{x}(t) = C_{1} e^{i\omega t}+C_{2} e^{-i\omega t}

It is more convenient to rewrite it as

S_{x}(t) = A \cos(\omega t) + B \sin(\omega t)

Supposedly you know the operator of spin at t=0 S_{x}(0), S_{y}(0), S_{z}(0). Then you obtain

A = S_{x}(0)

and from eq. (1)

B = \omega^{-1} d/dt [S_{x}(0)] = S_y(0)

So, the full solution is

S_{x}(t) = S_x(0) \cos(\omega t) + S_y(0) \sin(\omega t)

Eugene.
 
Oh yes, forgot the i's. All fixed now.

Using Euler's Formula and Eq. 1 to find B is very instructive. Thanks.
Clearly, the vector precesses around the z-axis, as there's no change in S_z, and does so in an elliptical manner based on S_x(0) and S_y(0).

We are not given S_i(0) for i=x,y,z. That is, I have given you all the information. I presume we cannot find them from the nature of the particle (and the subject of spin precession in a B-field, in general)? If so, I'll just leave them as is.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top