Heisenberg Uncertainty Maximum Lifetime of Photon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the maximum lifetime of a gamma ray photon, given a measurement precision of 1 part in 10^15 for its energy. The relevant equation, ΔtΔE≥ħ/2, links the uncertainties in energy (ΔE) and time (Δt), indicating that higher precision in energy measurement results in greater uncertainty in time. To calculate ΔE, the relative uncertainty is applied to the measured energy of 50 keV, leading to a method for determining Δt. Participants seek clarification on how to properly apply the concepts of uncertainty in this context, particularly regarding the implications of measuring energy with high precision. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
diggleM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In special conditions, it is possible to measure the energy of a gamma ray photon to 1 part in 10^15. For a photon energy of 50 keV, estimate the maximum lifetime that could be determined be a direct measurement of the spread of photon energy.


Homework Equations


ΔtΔE≥\hbar/2


The Attempt at a Solution



It seems simple enough using the given equation to solve for the maximum lifetime, however I'm not sure I'm understanding how the relative uncertainty of 1 part in 10^15 effects the problem. If someone would be able to explain how the relative uncertainty effects the calculation to me, it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diggleM said:
I'm not sure I'm understanding how the relative uncertainty of 1 part in 10^15 effects the problem.
Take another look at Heisenbergs relation - what do each of the terms mean?
 
The way I understand it, they can be thought of as terms of uncertainty for time and energy, which are inversely related. That is to say, if you measure the Energy to a high level of certainty, the level of uncertainty will be high as well.

Looking back in my text describing the relation, it mentions that if a particle has a definite energy, ΔE = 0. This leads me to thinking that to solve a value for ΔE, you could find the relative uncertainty where Relative Uncertainty = | uncertainty/measured quantity|, in this case the relative uncertainty would be 10^15 and measured quantity would be 50,000 eV, to solve for the uncertainty, ΔE, which could be used to solve for Δt.

These are still pretty new concepts to me so I'm not sure if that is an appropriate mode of thinking about this. Does that seems to makes sense or do you see flaws in my thought process?
 
If you know a measurement x to 1 part in 1000 then the relative uncertainty would be about 1/1000 and the uncertainty would be Δx=x/1000.

Use a value of planks constant in units of keV.(time) to avoid conversions.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top