How Is the Magnetic Field Calculated at the Midpoint of a Helmholtz Coil?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field at the midpoint of a Helmholtz coil configuration, consisting of two coaxial coils with 200 turns each and a radius of 25 cm, carrying a current of 12.2 mA. The user attempted to calculate the magnetic field using the formula B(z) = (μ₀/2π)(μ/z³) but arrived at an incorrect result. A misunderstanding regarding the relevance of the area and the correct formula for Helmholtz coils was highlighted, with a reference to a Wikipedia page providing the correct approach. The user expressed confusion over the calculations and acknowledged a mistake in not properly reviewing the relevant resources. The discussion illustrates the importance of careful analysis and verification when solving physics problems.
phyzmatix
Messages
313
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The picture shows (there's supposed to be a pic) a Helmholtz coil consisting of two circular coaxial coils, each of 200 turns and radius R = 25.0 cm, separated by a distance s = R. The two coils carry equal currents i = 12.2 mA in the same direction. Find the magnitude of the net magnetic field at point P, midway between the coils.

Homework Equations



B(z)= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi} \frac{\mu}{z^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this was a pretty straightforward question and did the following:

\mu=NiA=(200)(12.2 \times 10^{-3} A)(\pi \times (0.25 m)^2) =4.79 \times 10^{-1} Am^2

B(z)= (\frac{1.26 \times 10^{-6}H/m}{2 \pi})( \frac{4.79 \times 10^{-1}}{(0.125m)^3})
=4.918 \times 10^{-5}T

Now, the magnetic force from both coils are in the same direction, so I multiplied the above answer with two and got

\mbox{Force at P}=9.84 \times 10^{-5}

However, this doesn't seem to be correct according to the answers I have...Could you tell me where I went wrong please? I'm clueless.

Thanks!
phyz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi phyzmatix! :smile:

(Thanks for the PM.)

I get very confused about currents in coils.

Is the area relevant? :confused:

Anyway, there's a formula at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_coil which … erm … looks nothing like yours! :redface:
 
Cheers Tiny-Tim! There are no excuses here...I had that EXACT same page open in front of me last night and didn't notice that the answer was right there...Shows you that skimming too quickly isn't always the best way to approach things :redface:

Sorry to have bothered you :redface:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top