Help a mature student Friedmann equation

stormymouse
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Anybody like to help a physics student who did their BSc six years ago and has forgotten all their maths!
Its a problem from Andrew Liddle's Introduction to cosmology 5.5

The Friedmann eqn is

(a'/a)2 = 8TTG/3 P - k/a2

Consider the case k>o, with the universe containing matter only, so that p =p0/a3

Demonstrate that the parametric solution

a(y) = 4 TT G p0/3k (1-cos y) ; t(y) = 4TTGp0/3k3/2 (y-siny)

solves this equation where y runs from 0 to 2TT

Sorry about the crassness..I hope you can deciphere my symbols...

I know I should differentiate them and use the chain rule..but really my maths is rubbish!

Any fellow physicists I would much appreciate it...maybe I shouldn't be doing my masters..I need to dig out my old calculus book...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show some work before we can help you. (This really belongs in the homework section too). You are correct that you need to differentiate and use the chain rule. Perhaps you should have a go and post what you get.
 
Ok, so either you're not coming back, or you still can't attempt the problem. I'll give you a few hints: You vasically have two parametric functions a(y)=L(1-cos(y)) and t(y)=M(y-sin(y)), for some constants L and M. In the Friedmann equation, we have a term a'=\frac{da}{dt}. Using the chain rule we can write \frac{da}{dt}=\frac{da/dy}{dt/dy} from which you should be able to solve.
 
Sorry, thank you for all your help..that helps a lot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top