I Help a novice with EL equation derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation from the principle of least action. The user seeks clarification on expanding the action integral when varying the generalized coordinates and velocities. It is explained that time serves as the integration variable and does not contribute to the variation, which is why terms involving the partial derivative of L with respect to time are omitted. The expansion involves a Taylor series approach, retaining only first-order terms in the variations of the coordinates and velocities. Understanding functional derivatives and the calculus of variations is recommended for deeper insight into the topic.
Alex Cros
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

Reading Landau and Lifshitz Course of Theoretical Physics Volume 1: Mechanics (page 3) I got suck in the following step (and I cite in italics):

The change in S when q is replaced by q+δq is
\int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(q+δq, \dot q +δ\dot q, t)dt - \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(q, \dot q, t)dt

(So far so good)

When this difference is expanded in powers of δq and δ\dot q in the integrand, the leading terms are of the first order.

How do you expand that? Could anyone show me how explicitly if you don't know the explicit form of the Lagrangian?

The necessary condition for S (where S is the action) to have a minimum is that these terms (called the first variation, or simply the variation, of the integral) should be zero. Thus the principle of least action may be written in the form
δS = δ \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(q, \dot q, t)dt = 0


(Which I'm fine with the above expression)

Or, effecting the variation,
\int_{t_1}^{t_2} (<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial q}δq+<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}δ\dot q)<br /> dt = 0

Now my guess would have included \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} like:
\int_{t_1}^{t_2} (<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial q}δq+<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}δ\dot q + \frac{\partial L}{\partial t}dt)<br /> dt = 0
To perform the total differential of all variables.
Explain me like if I'm five why this guess is wrong.

Thanks so much in advance! And sorry for my lack of elemental knowledge.
-Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

##t## plays a different role here: it is the integration variable. We want to minimize ##S## by finding a path ##\Bigl ( q(t), \dot q(t) \Bigr )## that achieves this ##\delta S=0## condition. There is no value of ##t## to find; it just runs from ##t_1## to ##t_2## and nothing can be done with ##\partial L \over \partial t##. The time dependence of ##L## is present in the integration, though.
 
Thanks BvU!
Any ideas on how to do this and why is it relevant?
When this difference is expanded in powers of δq and δ\dot q in the integrand, the leading terms are of the first order.
 
Alex Cros said:
Thanks BvU!
Any ideas on how to do this and why is it relevant?

The expansion is basically a Taylor expansion about δq and δ{itex}\dot q{\itex}t keeping the first order powers in in the differentials. For a deeper understanding, read on functional derivatives and or the calculus of variations.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'A scenario of non uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...

Similar threads

Back
Top