HELP! Choosing Between Paraffin and Wood for Heat Storage

  • Thread starter Thread starter laramman2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
Paraffin is preferred over wood for heat storage due to its higher specific heat capacity of 2900 J/kgC compared to wood's 1750 J/kgC. This means paraffin can store more heat energy per unit mass, allowing for more effective heat retention. Additionally, paraffin has a high latent heat of fusion, which enables it to maintain a constant temperature during phase change, prolonging heat release. This characteristic makes paraffin particularly effective for applications requiring stable heat output. Overall, paraffin's thermal properties make it a superior choice for heat storage solutions.
laramman2
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
HELP! Thermodynamics question

Homework Statement


Which would you chose between paraffin & wood to make heat storage? Why?
specific heat of paraffin = 2900 J/kgC
specific heat of wood = 1750 J/KgC2. The attempt at a solution

They say that the answer is paraffin but I don't know why. Could anyone help me to deal with this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


laramman2 said:

Homework Statement


Which would you chose between paraffin & wood to make heat storage? Why?
specific heat of paraffin = 2900 J/kgC
specific heat of wood = 1750 J/KgC


2. The attempt at a solution

They say that the answer is paraffin but I don't know why. Could anyone help me to deal with this problem?
For effective heat storage you want the temperature of the substance to decline as slowly as possible as heat is removed.

Paraffin is also good because it has a very high latent heat of fusion, so if you heat it above its melting point it will stay at same temperature (ie its melting point) for a long time as the heat flows out of it.

AM
 


Andrew Mason said:
For effective heat storage you want the temperature of the substance to decline as slowly as possible as heat is removed.

Paraffin is also good because it has a very high latent heat of fusion, so if you heat it above its melting point it will stay at same temperature (ie its melting point) for a long time as the heat flows out of it.

AM

Thank you very much :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top