Help deriving Lagrange's Formula with the levi-civita symbol

radonballoon
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I'm really at a loss as to how to do this. I can prove the formula by just using determinants, but I don't really know how to do manipulations with the levi-civita symbol.
Here's what I have so far:
<br /> (\vec{B} \times \vec{C})_{i} = \epsilon_{ijk}(B_{j}C_{k})\vec{e_{i}}<br />

And I'm trying to get to:
<br /> \vec{A} \times (\vec{B} \times \vec{C}) = B(A \bullet C) - C(A \bullet B)<br />

Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ok So I figured it out, I'll just post the answer for the sake of completeness:

<br /> (\vec{B} \times \vec{C})_{k} = \epsilon_{kmn} (B_{m} C_{n})<br />

<br /> let (\vec{B} \times \vec{C}) = \vec{N} <br />

<br /> \vec{A} \times (\vec{B} \times \vec{C}) = \vec{A} \times \vec{N} <br />
<br /> (\vec{A} \times \vec{N})_{i} = \epsilon_{ijk} A_{j} N_{k}<br />
<br /> = \epsilon_{ijk} A_{j} (\epsilon_{kmn} B_{m} C_{n})
<br /> = \epsilon_{ijk} \epsilon_{kmn} (A_{j} B_{m} C_{n})

<br /> \epsilon_{ijk} \epsilon_{mnk} = \delta_{im} \delta_{jn} - \delta_{in} \delta_{jm} <br />

<br /> \vec{A} \times (\vec{B} \times \vec{C}) = (\delta_{im} \delta_{jn} - \delta_{in} \delta_{jm}) A_{j} B_{m} C_{n} <br />
<br /> = B_{i} A_{j} C_{j} - A_{j} B_{j} C_{i} <br />
<br /> = \vec{B}(\vec{A} \bullet \vec{C}) - \vec{C}(\vec{A} \bullet \vec{B})
 
It's threads like these that seem to be causing PF to accumulate helpful Google searches. :)
 
<br /> <br /> (\vec{B} \times \vec{C})_{i} = \epsilon_{ijk}(B_{j}C_{k})\vec{e_{i}}<br /> <br />

Should be:

<br /> <br /> (\vec{B} \times \vec{C})_{i} = \epsilon_{ijk}(B_{j}C_{k})<br /> <br />

And start using \cdot instead of that big black ball :-D
 
Haha wow this seems like so long ago. I couldn't find the dot for dot product, so thanks for that :D
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top