Help find the flux through the surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rombus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the flux of the vector field A=(2x,-z^2,3xy) through a cylindrical wedge surface defined by ρ=2, 0<φ<π/2, and 0 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of vector fields and flux calculations
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and transformations
  • Knowledge of surface integrals and their applications
  • Proficiency in using divergence theorem for flux calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert vector fields from rectangular to cylindrical coordinates
  • Study surface integrals in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the divergence theorem and its applications in vector calculus
  • Practice calculating flux through various surfaces using different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are involved in vector calculus, particularly those working on flux calculations through complex surfaces.

Rombus
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a vector field A=(2x,-z^2,3xy), find the flux of A through a surface defined by ρ<br /> =2, 0&lt;\phi&lt;\pi/2, 0&lt;z&lt;1

Homework Equations



∇\bulletA?


The Attempt at a Solution



Can I use divergence method here?
This is a closed surface correct? A cylindrical wedge?
Also do I need to convert the vector field to cylindrical form? Or the defined surface to rectangle form?

If I used divergence do I divide my answer by 4 since the wedge is a 1/4 of the cylinder?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The surface is not closed.
 
I agree. I read the problem as asking for the flux through the round surface of the wedge and not the other four faces.
 
Thanks for the replies.

This makes a lot more sense now. So knowing this I would integrate over the surfaces separately.

So it appears it would be easier to integrate in cylindrical form correct? So I would want to change the vector field from rectangular to cylindrical?
 
Rombus said:
So knowing this I would integrate over the surfaces separately.

You should only need to integrate over the one surface that is defined by the equalities & inequalities given.

So it appears it would be easier to integrate in cylindrical form correct? So I would want to change the vector field from rectangular to cylindrical?

Yes, that would probably be the easiest way to do it since the surface normal and differential area, and limits of integration will all be much simpler in cylindrical coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K