Help finding kinetic and potentail.

  • Thread starter Thread starter leonne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the kinetic and potential energy equations for a system involving two masses, m1 on a frictionless table and m2 hanging from a pulley. The confusion arises from the kinetic energy expression, which combines both masses and uses the same variable for both horizontal and vertical motion, despite m2 moving vertically. The potential energy is expressed as negative due to the choice of the reference point for height, where the initial position is set to zero. The main question is how to correctly formulate the Lagrangian for the system and derive the acceleration, highlighting the participants' struggle with the energy equations. Clarification is sought on the relationship between the velocities and the signs in the potential energy equation.
leonne
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


mass m1 rest on a frictionless horizontal table and is attached to a mass less string. The string runs horizontally to the edge of table passing threw mass less pulley and than mass2 hangs there.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I thought the kinetic would be
T=1/2 (m1\stackrel{.}{x}2) + m2\stackrel{.}{y}2)

and than potential would be U=gmy
but they have it as T=1/2 (m1+m2)\stackrel{.}{x}2)

U=-gmx

Why is this? I thought block 2 moves in the y direction so why is it given velocity in x direction same thing with potential and why is it negative?


thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
leonne said:

Homework Statement


mass m1 rest on a frictionless horizontal table and is attached to a mass less string. The string runs horizontally to the edge of table passing threw mass less pulley and than mass2 hangs there.
What is the question? :confused:
I thought the kinetic would be
T=1/2 (m1\stackrel{.}{x}2) + m2\stackrel{.}{y}2)
This is the kinetic energy at a certain value of x and y, where x = y in magnitude, since they move together
and than potential would be U=gmy
yes, at a certain point y, but if the initaial value of y is taken as zero at the start point, then this term is negative, since y is negative
but they have it as T=1/2 (m1+m2)\stackrel{.}{x}2)
same answer as your's, where x = y, and the equation is then factored
U=-gmx
Yes ,see above, and note x = y
Why is this? I thought block 2 moves in the y direction so why is it given velocity in x direction same thing with potential and why is it negative?


thanks
Still confused? But what is the actual question?
 
the question is to write down the Lagrangian for the system and to solve for acceleration that part is easy just suck at figuring out the potential and kinetic lol
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top