Help, I don't understand Hooke's law and my homework on it.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding Hooke's law in relation to a coil spring problem. A spring with a constant of 54 N/m is analyzed when a 1.0-kg mass is hung from it, extending its length to 35 cm. Participants clarify that the extension of the spring is proportional to the force applied, and the weight of the mass (9.8 N) can be used to calculate how much the spring stretches. The key equation discussed is F = kx, leading to the conclusion that the equilibrium length can be determined by rearranging the formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using distinct variables for clarity in calculations.
audreylynn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Problem)
A coil spring has a spring constant of 54 N/m. If the full length of the spring is 35 cm when a 1.0-kg mass is hung from it, what is the equilibrium length of the spring when the 1.0-kg mass is removed?

I have absolutely no idea how to even start this problem; and I know I can look in the back of the book to get the answer, but I'd reallylike to understand the problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated. :]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi audreylynn! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Hooke's law says that the extension of a spring (the stretched length minus the equilibrium length) is proportional to the force.

Hint: call the equilibrium length x, then the extension is 35 - x. :wink:
 
The spring constant value (54N/m) tells you that for every 54 N of force you apply to the spring it will (if it is physically able to) stretch one meter.
Your one kilo mass has a weight of 9.8 Newtons, which it can apply to the spring if hung on the end.
If 54 N stretches it 1 meter, how far could 9.8 N stretch it?
When you have done this, you know how much the string has stretched (with mass attached) beyond its original length (no mass attached).
You are told how long the spring is with the weight on, so ...
 
Thank you so much! :]

So I would use the equation F=kx with m•g=F.
Then I could just plug in the numbers to the formula as...
9.81=54(x)
9.81=54(.35-x)

Like that's how I'd do it?
 
audreylynn said:
9.81=54(.35-x)

That's it! :smile:

(but never use the same letter for two different things! :rolleyes: :wink: :eek:)
 
Thank you. :]
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top