Help me convert this relationship into a linear equation

In summary, the person is looking for a way to convert a given equation into a linear relationship where 'a' is the gradient of the straight line. The equation is not linear and cannot be simplified, but the person is seeking alternative methods such as using logarithms to find a linear relationship. The ultimate goal is to calculate 'a' from known values of 't' and 'h'.
  • #1
kd001
43
0
Is there anyway I can convert the attached equation into a linear relationship so that 'a' is the gradient of the straight line. 't' and 'h' are both variables. It doesn't matter exactly what the x and y values are. I just need 'a' to be the gradient of the straight line. I tried lots of different things but couldn't manage it. I would appreciate it very much if anybody can help me with this.

Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • formula.jpg
    formula.jpg
    2.4 KB · Views: 352
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I typed the formula because I'm not sure if the attachment can be seen. I hope its clear enough

(at2)/2 = 0.25 - t(2ah)0.5
 
  • #3
You can use the quadratic formula to get t as a function of h, but the relationship is not
linear.
 
  • #4
I know the equation I wrote is not linear but is it possible to make it linear? For example sometimes it is possible to take logs to make a relationship linear. I'm not saying this is the case here but are there any other such 'tricks' to derive a linear equation from the one I wrote? I just need the gradient to be 'a'. I hope I'm making myself clear.

The reason I'm trying to do this is that I've got a series of known values for 't' and 'h' and I wanted calculate 'a' from the gradient of a straight line. Obviously if a linear relationship can be derived, the x and y values aren't going to be 't' or 'h' but some other value that can be given in terms of these variables.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
If what I'm trying to do doesn't make sense to anyone, then what do you think would be the best way of calculating 'a', from the given values of 'h' and 't'?
 
  • #6
When you took the logarithm of an equation such as y=ex to create a linear equation, you were supposed to be taking the logarithm of BOTH sides, so basically you have ln(y)=x. This means that you can have a linear equation (even though this expression is still the same as y=ex) if you plot the function on axes that are not linear. You can have the usual x axis, but you'll have to change the y-axis to ln(y).

i.e. at the point y=1, you should instead have ln(y)=0 on your axis. At [itex]y=e\approx 2.718[/itex] you should instead have y=1. At y=e2, y=2 etc.

OR you can keep the y-axis the same, but change the x-axis to ex so at the usual x=1 point, instead have x=e etc.

With a bit of ingenuity, you can apply the same concept to your problem.

However, I'm unsure if this is what you're looking for.
 
  • #7
I am still struggling with this. Can someone at least show me how to solve the equation for 'a'?

Thanks a lot.
 
  • #8
kd001 said:
Can someone at least show me how to solve the equation for 'a'?

Subtract 0.25 from both sides, then square both sides. You should end up with a quadratic equation in a.
 

1. How do I convert a relationship into a linear equation?

To convert a relationship into a linear equation, you first need to identify the variables involved in the relationship. Then, determine the type of relationship (direct or inverse) and use the appropriate equation to express it in terms of a linear equation.

2. What is the difference between a direct and an inverse relationship?

In a direct relationship, as one variable increases, the other variable also increases. In an inverse relationship, as one variable increases, the other decreases.

3. Can all relationships be converted into linear equations?

No, not all relationships can be converted into linear equations. Linear equations represent relationships that are proportional and can be expressed in a straight line on a graph. If the relationship is not proportional, it cannot be converted into a linear equation.

4. What is the standard form of a linear equation?

The standard form of a linear equation is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. This form is also known as the slope-intercept form.

5. How can I use a linear equation to make predictions about the relationship?

Once a relationship has been converted into a linear equation, you can use the equation to make predictions about the relationship. You can plug in different values for the independent variable (x) and solve for the dependent variable (y) to determine the corresponding values. This allows you to predict the outcome of the relationship for different inputs.

Similar threads

B Why is a one-variable linear equation called linear?
    • General Math
Replies
18
Views
2K
B What is a Linear Relationship?
    • General Math
Replies
21
Views
2K
I Exploring the Benefits of Linearizing Data - Improve Analysis and Visualization
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
11
Views
758
B Can Linear Systems of Equations Have More Than Three Solutions?
    • General Math
Replies
29
Views
2K
B Calculating 'Typical' Grade of a Hiking Trail
    • General Math
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Need help coming up with an equation for a bend angle calculation
    • General Math
Replies
7
Views
928
MHB Height/diameter relationship of 19 (H8/D8=19)
    • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Can Nonlinear Equations be Linearized Using Free Parameters?
    • General Math
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Linear Models vs Nonlinear Models
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
22
Views
2K
I Plotting polar equations and scale invariance
    • General Math
Replies
7
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top