Solving Coulomb Barrier Penetrability with a Confusing Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the formula for calculating the probability of protons penetrating the Coulomb barrier, specifically the equation Probability = exp[(- (EG/E))^0.5]. The user is confused about how to correctly apply the formula with given values of EG (Gamow energy) as 493 keV and E as 2 eV, leading to a negative number when calculating. The main issue is the order of operations, as the user initially attempts to take the square root of a negative number, which is not possible. The correct approach is to first divide EG by E, then take the square root of the negative result, and finally apply the exponential function. The user ultimately resolves the confusion and shares the correct method for solving the problem.
daleklama
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There isn't an exact problem I'm struggling with, it's one small part of a larger problem, which involves finding the probability protons will penetrate the Coulomb barrier.

I'm trying to understand an example in my notes, and the bit that confuses me is attached as an image file.

Homework Equations



The equation is shown in the attachment, and I know it's correct.

Probability = exp [ (- (EG/E)) ^ 0.5]

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically what I don't understand is simple - how the answer was found using the formula.

EG (Gamow energy) is 493 kev, E is 2 ev, but when those are subbed into the formula, my notes say you should get 1.5 x 10 ^ 7.

When I try to work it out on my calculator, it says error.

I firstly divide - EG/E, get a negative number = - 246.5
Then I try to put it to the power of a half (same as taking the square root) and I can't, because it's a minus number. I know you can't perform that operation with a minus number.
And then you're supposed to take the exponential, but I haven't managed to put it to the power of a half yet!

How on Earth does this formula work? The number you're trying to put to the power of a half is always going to be negative! :(

I'm stumped!

Hope the attachment works okay, thank you for any help.
 

Attachments

  • whatdoesthismean.jpg
    whatdoesthismean.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 501
Physics news on Phys.org


Apologies, I've solved it!

If anyone wants to know the solution:

With that kind of equation, you're supposed to divide first, THEN put it to the power of a half, THEN add in the minus sign, THEN take the exponential.

Sorry guys!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top