Does a Charged Rod Repel More Strongly Than a Point Charge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcfor3ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
A charged rod with +2Q will repel a +q charge more strongly than a +2Q point charge when both are placed at the same distance d due to the rod's ability to exert force in both x and y components. The discussion highlights that the rod can be considered as composed of many point charges, which leads to some force contributions canceling out due to their vector nature. In contrast, two point charges do not experience this cancellation, resulting in a straightforward calculation of force. The force on the +q charge from the rod is influenced by the distribution of charge along its length, while the point charges exert a direct force without such complexities. Ultimately, the rod's geometry and charge distribution play a crucial role in determining the strength of the repulsive force.
jcfor3ver
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
HELP PLEASE! A pt charge question.

Homework Statement


Would a rod with +2Q charge repel a +q charge (placed a distance d from the center of the rod) more than a +2Q point charge repelling a +q charge (same distance away as the rod charge) ?


Homework Equations


Eforce=k(q1)(q2)/d^2

Efield of rod = (1/4pi*(epsilonsubnot which = 8.85*10^-12))* (magnitude of q/d*sqrt(d^2+(L/2)^2))


The Attempt at a Solution



I would think so since the rod is acting on the point charge in both y and x components.

Also, would the same rod from above, repel the same +q charge more than an arced rod with the same scenario (equidistant d from the center)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I would think about it like this.
Think of the rod as made of tiny point charges. When you make a vector sum of all of the force contributions made by all of the point charges, won't some parts of the contributions cancel? Think about the components of the force vectors that are parallel to the rod.

In the case of two point charges, there will be no canceling.
 


Let's reason this out. Consider point charges +2Q and +q separated by d. The force on +q is F0=k(2Q)q/d2. Now divide +2Q in two equal pieces and place them a distance x apart so that +q is on the perpendicular bisector of x.

Is the resultant force on +q greater than, equal to or smaller than F0?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top