Help Solve My Non-Calculus Physics Homework Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a non-calculus physics homework problem involving a uniformly charged sphere and applying Gauss's law. For part A, the electric field outside the sphere is derived as E = q/(4πε₀r²), confirming that it matches the expression E = (ρR³)/(3ε₀r²). In part B, the electric field inside the sphere at a distance r from the center is shown to be E = (ρr)/(ε₀). The comparison of results at r = R reveals that both expressions for the electric field yield consistent results when substituting q with the charge density and volume of the sphere. The discussion emphasizes the application of Gauss's law without needing Coulomb's law for this problem.
liliphys
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a HW problem for non-calculus based physics that I can't seem to figure out. Please help me if you can:

Consider a sphere of radius R woth a uniform positive charge distribution (rho)=q/V. Using Gauss's law, prove (a) that the magnitude of the electric field outside the spherical volume is E=q/4(pi)(permittivity of free space)r^2= (rho) R^3 / 3 (permittivity of free space)r^2, (b) that the magnitude of the electric field insode the sphere at a distance r from the center is E=(rho)r/(permittivity), (c) compare the results of a and b when r=R.


I have Gauss's law: E(4(pi)r^2=4(pi)koQ and that for r>R, E=ko Q/r^2
and i substituted in (rho)V for Q and 4/3 (pi)r^3 for V and simplified, but this did not prove part A.
And for r<R, Q'=Q(r/R)^3 because the inner sphere encloses a volume 4/3 (pi)r^3 which is (r/R)^3 times the total volume. but this doesn't work out either. And how do i reconcile ko from coulomb with the permittivity?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by liliphys
I have Gauss's law: E(4(pi)r^2=4(pi)koQ and that for r>R, E=ko Q/r^2
and i substituted in (rho)V for Q and 4/3 (pi)r^3 for V and simplified, but this did not prove part A.
All you need is Gauss's law. Gauss's law in terms of permitivity of free space (pfs) is:
E*(Area) = Q/(pfs). The area is 4&pi;r2; the volume of charge is 4/3*&pi;R3. This should give you the answer you seek.
And for r<R, Q'=Q(r/R)^3 because the inner sphere encloses a volume 4/3 (pi)r^3 which is (r/R)^3 times the total volume. but this doesn't work out either.
For r<R, use the same idea. The area is 4&pi;r2; the volume of charge is 4/3*&pi;r3. This should work.
And how do i reconcile ko from coulomb with the permittivity?
You don't need to use Coulomb's law, only Gauss's law. But k0 = 1/(4&pi;(pfs)).
 


First of all, don't worry, I am here to help you solve this problem. Let's start with part A: To prove that the magnitude of the electric field outside the spherical volume is E=q/4(pi)(permittivity of free space)r^2= (rho) R^3 / 3 (permittivity of free space)r^2, we can use Gauss's law. According to Gauss's law, the electric flux through any closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed by that surface divided by the permittivity of free space. In this case, we have a spherical surface with radius r, outside the spherical volume. Therefore, the electric flux through this surface is given by E(4(pi)r^2)=q/permittivity of free space. Rearranging this equation, we get E=q/4(pi)(permittivity of free space)r^2, which is the desired result.

Moving on to part B: To prove that the magnitude of the electric field inside the sphere at a distance r from the center is E=(rho)r/(permittivity), we can again use Gauss's law. In this case, we have a spherical surface with radius r, inside the spherical volume. Therefore, the electric flux through this surface is given by E(4(pi)r^2)=q'/permittivity of free space, where q' is the charge enclosed by this surface. Now, q' is equal to the charge density (rho) multiplied by the volume enclosed by the surface, which is 4/3 (pi)r^3. Therefore, q'=(rho)(4/3)(pi)r^3. Substituting this value in the equation, we get E(4(pi)r^2)=((rho)(4/3)(pi)r^3)/permittivity of free space. Simplifying this equation, we get E=(rho)r/permittivity of free space, which is the desired result.

Lastly, let's compare the results of part A and B when r=R. In part A, we get E=q/4(pi)(permittivity of free space)R^2. In part B, we get E=(rho)R/permittivity of free space. Now, we know that q=(rho)V, where V is the volume of the sphere. In this case, V=4/3 (pi)R^3. Substituting
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top