Help understanding solar imaging wavelength and coronal temp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of solar imaging data from the TRACE observatory, specifically regarding the correlation between wavelengths and plasma temperatures in the solar corona. The original confusion arose from a misinterpretation of the wavelengths associated with different temperature plasma, where it was assumed that shorter wavelengths corresponded to higher temperatures. However, it was clarified that the wavelengths relate to electronic transitions in ionized iron, with the temperature dependence linked to the population of these species rather than the wavelengths themselves. The wavelengths 171A, 195A, and 284A correspond to Fe IX, Fe XII, and Fe XV, respectively, indicating that higher wavelengths are associated with higher temperature plasma. This understanding emphasizes the importance of recognizing the nature of emissions and the specific ionization states involved in solar imaging.
Bob65
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The TRACE website has a solar image that is described as, quoting from the text associated with the image, "This is a false-color, 3-layer composite from the TRACE observatory showing the solar corona: the blue, green, and red channels show the 171A, 195A, and 284A, respectively. These TRACE filters are most sensitive to emission from 1, 1.5, and 2 million degree plasma, thus showing the entire corona and detail of coronal loops in the lower solar atmosphere."

And now that I typed the description above into this post, I think I see where my misunderstanding has arisen. I thought the text stated that the 171A radiation corresponded to the 1 MK plasma, the 195A to the 1.5 MK, and the 284A to the 2 MK plasma. This seemed backward to me, since the shorter wavelength radiation should correspond to the higher temperature plasma (e.g., the 171A radiation corresponds to the 2 MK plasma, etc.) I suspect that is true, and the quoted text description "sorta implies" (but does not state) an incorrect association of shorter wavelengths with lower temperature plasma.

Am I correct? Does the 171A radiation correspond to the 2 MK plasma, etc.?

Thanks for the help.

Bob65
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The reference you quoted discusses the solar corona so the light being imaged is in emission. The emission is from recombination of electrons and positive ions in the plasma, namely iron. The wavelengths associated with the wavelengths you are asking about correspond to electronic transitions (recombinations of electrons and positively charged iron ions) and the wavelength is entirely dependent on the energy level differences of the various ionized species rather than temperature. The population of the energetic species is temperature dependent.

Wavelength/ Species
171 A/ Fe IX
195 A/ Fe XII
284 A/ Fe XV

You can see that as we go up in wavelength we are viewing progressively more energetic events. That is, the temperature at which we view iron fifteen or Fe15 transitions necessarily needs to be at a higher temperature than FeIX. By the time we are removing the more inner shell electrons to create a place for an ion/electron recombination we are probing much more energic events, ie. higher temperatures.

Interesting reading.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top