Help Understanding Trig Identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter lntz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
lntz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I have a problem I'm hoping someone can help me with. I'm writing a bit of code for computing the value of pi that converges faster than a previous piece that relies on the leibniz series.

Anyway, I'm struggling with showing how this identity arises. tan(2t) = 2 * tan(t) / 1 - tan2(t)

So far I've got to this point;

sin(2θ) = 2sin(θ)cos(θ) and,
cos(2θ) = cos2(θ) - sin2(θ)

tan(2θ) = sin(2θ) / cos(2θ)

= 2sin(θ) cos(θ) / cos2(θ) - sin2(θ)

From there, I know that this is the step I'm supposed to take but I'm struggling to make sense of it. =[ 2sin(θ)cos(θ) / cos2(θ) ] * 1 / 1 - tan2

Doing that step brings me back to the identity, but why it works is what I don't understand. I have been told that it is dividing by cos2θ but I must be doing something wrong because it doesn't seem to work out for me. when dividing through by cos2θ I get 2sin(θ)cos(θ) / 1 - tan2θ

I would really appreciate someone explaining this without making any large jumps in the reasoning. (I shouldn't be doing maths at this time, but it's really bugging me)

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your algebra is OK to this step:

tan(2θ) = sin(2θ) / cos(2θ)

= 2sin(θ) cos(θ) / (cos^2(θ) - sin^2(θ))

Now, what you need to do is divide both the numerator and the denominator by cos^2(theta) and then simplify.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top