Help, using Truth Table prove that the following logic statement is a Tautology

AI Thread Summary
To prove that the logic statement p ∧ (p → q) → q is a tautology, a truth table must be constructed showing all possible truth values for p and q. The table should include columns for p, q, p → q, and the final expression p ∧ (p → q) → q, which must evaluate to true in all cases. The correct arrangement of the truth table does not significantly impact the outcome, but it is common to list rows starting with true values at the top. The final column should display all true values to confirm the statement is a tautology.
Tek1Atom
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By providing a truth table, show that the following logic statement is a tautology:

p ∧ (p → q) → qAny help will be much appreciated.

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would set up a truth table with columns for p, q, and p ==> q. You know how many rows you need, right?
 
p | q | P → q
-------------
T | T | T
T | F | F
F | T | T
F | F | T

Thank you Mark44 but I don't think this is the correct answer/method as the output has to be true in all cases in order for it to be labeled a tautology. Any other suggestions?
 
You are missing at least one column, multiple columns if you want to break things down.
 
D H could you give me an example please as I am new to logic...
 
You have the truth table for implication. p→q obviously is not a tautology. You weren't asked to show that. You were asked to show that p∧(p→q)→q is a tautology. Your truth table needs to end with a p∧(p→q)→q column on the right and with all four values in this column being T.
 
Thank you DH, that was very helpful. My final question is, does it matter which way we write down the truth table?

e.g.

which one is correct?

p | q | P → q | p∧(p→q)→q
---------------------------
T | T | T | T
T | F | F | T
F | T | T | T
F | F | T | T

OR

p | q | P → q | p∧(p→q)→q
---------------------------
F | F | T | T
F | T | T | T
T | F | F | T
T | T | T | T
 
You aren't going to get points for that. At least I hope you aren't. There is a thing called showing your work.
 
Tek1Atom said:
Thank you DH, that was very helpful. My final question is, does it matter which way we write down the truth table?

e.g.

which one is correct?

p | q | P → q | p∧(p→q)→q
---------------------------
T | T | T | T
T | F | F | T
F | T | T | T
F | F | T | T

OR

p | q | P → q | p∧(p→q)→q
---------------------------
F | F | T | T
F | T | T | T
T | F | F | T
T | T | T | T

To answer your question about the order, it doesn't really matter, but these are usually presented with the top row being T T ... and the bottom row being F F ...
 
  • #10
Thank You Mark44. You have been great!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top