Help with a creative writing piece (not homework)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trickofthehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Writing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of incorporating long-range spectrography in a science fiction narrative involving a spaceship traveling faster than light (FTL) within a pocket dimension. The author seeks a realistic method for the ship to analyze star systems while maintaining its dimensional bubble, which requires significant power to generate. Suggestions include utilizing ambient radiation from the star system or developing a device to transmit radiation signals into the pocket dimension. However, the feasibility of these concepts raises concerns about the consistency of the fictional physics framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly relativity and light speed limitations.
  • Familiarity with science fiction tropes, especially regarding faster-than-light travel.
  • Knowledge of spectrography and its applications in astronomy.
  • Conceptualization of pocket dimensions and their implications in fictional narratives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for integrating scientific principles into science fiction writing.
  • Explore the concept of ambient radiation and its potential applications in fictional technology.
  • Investigate existing science fiction works that successfully blend advanced technology with realistic physics.
  • Learn about the implications of dimensional travel on narrative structure and character development.
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction writers, physicists interested in speculative fiction, and anyone looking to create believable technological frameworks within fictional narratives.

trickofthehan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I would like some insight regarding a creative writing piece I am working on. As I stated on my topic this is not homework, it is an independent science fiction piece I've been working on for some time.

I apologize in advance if this is in the wrong forum, and would appreciate direction to the proper forum if it is in violation of forum rules/guidelines.

My conundrum involves the use of long range sensors on a ship that is moving faster than the speed of light. Personal disclaimer: I have a general knowledge of physics but am in no means an expert and am taking fictional liberties (many apologies!).

To be more exact; my fictional spaceship is traveling inside a pocket dimension which allows it to then move faster than the speed of light through conventional means (Ion engines). I thought this to be the most 'realistic' form of FTL travel that allows my ship to circumvent traditional laws of relativity. I also figured that it neatly avoided the issue of running into a speck of dust at several times the speed of light (big bang part 2?).

So my problem is that I require a way for the ship to be able to use spectography to analyze star systems it approaches, while inside of the dimensional bubble. This ability is vital to my work as it is key to conveying the main character's growing sense of futility in his mission, which he hides physically from the rest of his crew.

I cannot simply have the ship drop out of it's 'bubble', as it's already established that it takes it approximately 15 months to generate enough power to create this effect in the first place. Also the ship cannot afford to constantly drop in and out of spin drive because of concerns involving maintenance and economy of resources.

I apologize for being so vauge, but I am looking at a potential publisher and can't afford to be too liberal with the details of my work. Also I realize that I am taking several liberties with the laws of physics in general, but I would like to limit those liberties and establish every technology and aspect of my fictional ship in as much reality as possible.

With that in mind, does this community have any thoughts on how a ship operating inside a pocket dimension might be able to still conduct long range spectrography? I would really like to avoid 'magical and mystical' futuristic technology that just makes stuff work. Seems like a cop out to me.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm... well, I should start by saying that we really can't offer much more than speculation here. Physics is a carefully constructed logical framework and once you break one rule (like the speed-of-light limit) or invent one new concept (like pocket dimensions), there's no telling how much else of physics you'll have to discard to get a consistent system.

Anyway, just for the fun of it, let's see if I understand you correctly: basically you're saying that the ship does its FTL travel by shifting to some sort of alternate spacetime (the "pocket dimension"), travels a while, then shifts back to ordinary space at a point which is further away than it should have been able to travel in that time? If that's the case, there has to be some way for the radiation signals from the ship in the pocket dimension to get to the star system and back. Sometimes the argument is made that radiation can do things which normal matter can't (like in Stargate, radio signals can travel in both directions through a wormhole), so you might try to justify that somehow. Or the ship could have some sort of a passive sensor that picks up ambient radiation emitted/absorbed/deflected by the star system being scanned. (I guess that would make sense for spectrography) In that case I think you'd need some sort of device that could bring the radiation into the pocket dimension from the normal universe. The trouble is, a ship that's in a pocket dimension can't really have a well-defined notion of position in the normal universe at the same time, so you'd have to invent some method of specifying what location in normal space this device would be taking radiation from.

To be honest, I really don't see this working without some sort of major technological magic. But perhaps that's why I'm a scientist and not a science fiction writer myself :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
11K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K