Help with a Problem Involving Eigenvalues and Exponential Functions

PBJinx
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1.\frac{dx}{dt}= \stackrel{9 -12}{2 -1}

x(0)=\stackrel{-13}{-5}


So I seem to be having issues with this problem

There are 2 eigenvalues that I obtained from setting

Det[A-rI]=0

That gave me r^{2}-8r+15=0

solving for r and finding the roots i got

(r-3)*(r-5)=0

so the roots are r_{1}=3 and r_{2}=5

putting those back into [A-rI] i obtained

r_{1}

4y-12z=0
2y-6z=0

so the vector w_{1}=\stackrel{2}{1}

for r_{2} i obtained

4y-12z=0
2y-6z=0

so w_{2}=\stackrel{3}{1}

I am now left with this equation

v(t)=[W][e^{t\Lambda}c

Where c=[W^{-1}v_{0}

that leads to finding W^{-1} where W=\stackrel{2 3}{1 1}

W^{-1}=\stackrel{-1 3}{1 -2}

c=[\stackrel{2}{3}

I put back into my equation and get

V(t)=\stackrel{4e^{3t} + 6e^{5t}}{2e^{3t}+3e^{5t}}


i put that into webwork and i get an incorrect answer

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you mean
\begin{pmatrix} x_1' \\ x_2' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 9 & -12 \\ 1 & -2\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{pmatrix}
 
lanedance said:
do you mean
\begin{pmatrix} x_1' \\ x_2' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 9 & -12 \\ 1 & -2\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \end{pmatrix}

yes, sorry i am not used to using typing it out this way
 
just a little hard to work out exactly what youre doing, I'm not too sure what you did with the wronksian

isn't the general solution
\textbf{v(t)} = \textbf{w}_1 e^{3t}+ \textbf{w}_2 e^{5t}
 
lanedance said:
just a little hard to work out exactly what youre doing, I'm not too sure what you did with the wronksian

isn't the general solution
\textbf{v(t)} = \textbf{w}_1 e^{3t}+ \textbf{w}_2 e^{5t}


thank you for the help. i went to the professor today and figured it out with him.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top