Help with Calculating Moles of Atoms in Chemistry Lab

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbaybay94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of moles of magnesium atoms from a magnesium ribbon used in a chemistry lab. The question is clarified to mean that the focus is on determining the moles of magnesium, not the physical form of the ribbon. To find the moles, one should use the formula grams multiplied by molar mass, and then convert moles to atoms using Avogadro's number (6.02 x 10^23). Additional context from the lab, such as whether the magnesium was burned or dissolved, could influence the calculations but is not strictly necessary for the basic question. Understanding the distinction between moles of atoms and moles of molecules is also highlighted as potentially relevant.
jbaybay94
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I have a quick question about a problem in my lab. The question is:

Calculate the number or moles of atoms of magnesium ribbon used.

Now there is just too many "of"s in that sentence for me.

Now this maybe a stupid question, but what is the question asking exactly? What do I have to do? Am I just looking for moles? What does "moles of atoms" mean.

Oh and I know how to do all the conversions and stuff I just don't understand what the question is asking!

YOUR HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED!


THIS IS ALSO DUE TOMORROW SO HELP QUICK!

Do you just find the moles (grams x mol/molar mass) and then when you get the number of moles convert it to atoms ( times 6.02 x 10^23)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't feel alone, question seems to be ambiguous. List both number of moles and number of atoms, just in case.
 
All the information you need is or would be readily available. Don't worry too much about the "ribbon" physical form of the Magnesium. What was important is that a precise amount of Magnesium was used (in your lab exercise). The question, "Calculate the number or moles of atoms of magnesium ribbon used", really asks you to calculate the number of moles of Magnesium.

Other information comes from your exercise and lab activity which you did not share in your posting. Did you burn Magnesium? With what? Did you dissolve a magnesium ribbon? In what kind of solution?
 
On the second thought - there is a difference between "number of moles of atoms of oxygen in 16g" and "number of moles of molecules of oxygen in 16g", so while in most cases this additional information is not necessary, sometimes it is perfectly in place.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top