Help with Calculating Planet's Orbital Period

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks assistance in calculating the orbital period of a hypothetical small planet located eight times further from the Sun than Earth. The discussion revolves around applying Kepler's Third Law, which states that the square of the orbital period (T) is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis (R) of its orbit. By substituting R = 8 AU into the formula T^2 ∝ R^3, the user derives that T^2 equals 512, leading to T being approximately 16√2 years. The calculation is confirmed as correct, concluding the discussion with a sense of accomplishment.
tinksy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi, could someone please help me with this problem??

If a small planet were discovered with a distance from the sun eight times that of the Earth, what would you predict for its period in (Earth) years. (i.e. how many times longer would it take to go round the sun than the Earth does.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i will not give you the answer straight away, but here's the hint---
get orbital velocity v as a function of radius r

dynamics of the system(*) :

from Newton's second law and law of gravitation,
(m*v^2)/R = (G*M*m)/R^2


get v(r) and substitute in the kinemetical relation which you got correct,that is, T=2(pi)r/v

this will give you T(r) which is usually called "kepler's third law".


*assumption: all orbits are circular

justification : though the orbits that actually elliptical ,the eccentricity is very small.(dont worry if you don't understand this,take this as a side remark).

cheers :smile:
 
Last edited:
thanks teddy...

could u tell me if I'm right?

i've used kepler's law T^2 (directly proportional to) R^3
so if R = 8R (as for Earth, R = 1AU so for the planet, R = 8AU)
kepler's law: R^3/T^2 = 1
therefore, T^2 = 8^3/1
so T = (root)512 = 16(root)2 ...? is that correct?
 
yup,its right.
bye :smile:
 
yaaaaaay! thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top