Help with extracting alpha from: -alpha-asin(sin(alpha)(r/l)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbarger1225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alpha
dbarger1225
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am using the Law of Cosines to extract and angle I need from a shaft that is turning on an air engine by piston oscillation and I am having a brain fart on if there are any identities I am missing that can help me pull '\alpha' from the right side of my equation:

acos(((h-pl)^{2}-r^{2}-l^{2})/(-2*r*l))-\pi=-\alpha-asin(sin(\alpha)(r/l))

I would like to solve the entire equation for \alpha and the other variables can be treated like constants.

Thanks for the help or attempts in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well - you didn't close the brackets in the arcsine, so it's hard to tell - but asin(sin(x))=x
 
I fixed the bracket issue, I apologize about that.

I am concerned with the (r/l) term inside of the equation. I understand that asin(sin(x))=x .. but I'm certain that asin(sin(x)(r/l)) --DNE-- (r/l)x
 
Oh I think I see, it wasn't clear to me if the r/l was multiplied with the alpha or the sine-alpha, or with the arcsine.
This what you mean?

\sin^{-1}( \frac{r}{l}\sin\alpha )

... afaik you can't extract alpha from this sort of equation - you need to be cleverer in the setup or use an approximation (or use a numerical method).

Equation is of form: x+sin-1(A.sin(x))=b ... solve for x. argh. (assuming the RHS is all constants)

Note: the arcsin will be undefined for some alpha, depending on the value of rl - you want |sin(α)| < l/r (something...)

Where did you start from?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top