Help with logarithmic equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter chirumu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a logarithmic equation and simplifying expressions using logarithmic properties. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying logarithmic laws, such as converting constants into logarithmic form and combining terms. A key point is that the original expression should be simplified step by step, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the answer is -4. There is also a mention of the difficulty in determining the negative exponent without a calculator, highlighting a common challenge in understanding logarithmic functions. Overall, a clear understanding of logarithmic properties is essential for solving such equations effectively.
chirumu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6162/unledsxy.png

Homework Equations



logb(x)-logb(y) = logb(x/y)
logb(x^n) = nlogb(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



i am stuck on what to do because of the 4-2-2 portion. I've attempted it multiple times to get the solution (-4) but i just don't get how to do it because i keep getting the answer wrong.

I guess i don't understand how to combine it into one log this is my attempt nontheless:

log3(4-2)-2log3(6)
log3(2)-log3(12)
log3(2/12)
log3(x) = (2/12)

:/ I'm not sure what to do because i don't know how to treat the 4-2-2 :/ i know i can't combine the -2 where i want..

actually no wait, I've just had a mindwave. Would i convert 2 into a log as well.
I will try that now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the question you're working on?

There is no question given in your post.
 
chirumu said:

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6162/unledsxy.png[/QUOTE]

I am not certain what your question is, like Sammy, here. However, I tried to simplify the equation (quoted above) and it brought me to -4. I understand this is the answer you were looking for? If yes, read down:

Step 1: Figure out how to change "2" to a log of base 3.
Step 2: If you've managed to do step 1, then think of your laws of logarithm and then, indices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Now that I've taken a closer look at your attempt to this problem, I see that you don't seem to know your laws of logarithm.

I'll try to do a breakdown of a few of the operations and hopefully, things will make more sense.

What you did was:

2\log_{3}6 = log_{3}(6\times2)

Here's how it should have been manipulated:

2\log_{3}6 = log_{3}(6^2)= log_{3}36

Also, in this situation:

2 = log_{3}(3^2)

I would urge you to review your laws of logarithm because it seems to me that this is not very clear to you. I think the website math2.org has some good explanations.
 
thankyou for your help :)
i initially skipped this one and moved onto the others and after having done a few more its become more clear to me.

in the end:

log3(4)-2-2log3(6)

given a^c=b and loga(b)=c
to change 2 to base 3: log3(9) =2

so

log3(4)-log3(9)-2log3(6)

log3(4)-log3(9)-log3(6^2)

log3(4)-log3(9)-log3(36)


log3(4/9/36) = x

3(x) = (4/9/36)

x = -4

however i couldn't figure out -4 without a calculator :I I'm trying to stop using my calculator as much because its the devil. I've normally been able to solve the power, but in this instance the power is negative and the answer (4/9/36) is 0.01234... and i wasnt sure. Upon inspection given the fact that (4/9/36) IS 0.01234... i could kind of guess the power would be negative, but i would not of been able to figure it was -4. Could you offer any advice on this.
 
Mépris said:
I am not certain what your question is, like Sammy, here. However, I tried to simplify the equation (quoted above) and it brought me to -4. I understand this is the answer you were looking for? If yes, read down:

The image in the OP is NOT an equation. An equation ALWAYS has "=" in it somewhere.

chirumu said:
thankyou for your help :)
i initially skipped this one and moved onto the others and after having done a few more its become more clear to me.

in the end:

log3(4)-2-2log3(6)

given a^c=b and loga(b)=c
to change 2 to base 3: log3(9) =2

so

log3(4)-log3(9)-2log3(6)

log3(4)-log3(9)-log3(6^2)

log3(4)-log3(9)-log3(36)


log3(4/9/36) = x

3(x) = (4/9/36)

x = -4
Your first post did not make this clear, but apparently you are supposed to simplify the given expression. When you rewrite an expression in a different form, use = to indicate that the different forms are equal.

You do not need to introduce a variable. Your work should look something like this:
log3(4) - 2 - 2log3(6)
= log3(4) - log3(9) - 2log3(6)
= log3(4/9) - 2log3(6)
= log3(4/9) - log3(36)
= log3(4/((9*36)

If you continue simplifying, you can get this down to a final result of -4.

chirumu said:
however i couldn't figure out -4 without a calculator :I I'm trying to stop using my calculator as much because its the devil. I've normally been able to solve the power, but in this instance the power is negative and the answer (4/9/36) is 0.01234... and i wasnt sure. Upon inspection given the fact that (4/9/36) IS 0.01234... i could kind of guess the power would be negative, but i would not of been able to figure it was -4. Could you offer any advice on this.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top