Help with quantum computing notation

Joao
Messages
80
Reaction score
8
Hi everyone! Sorry for the bad English!
I'm trying to read the "entanglement between photons that never coexisted " from 2012. Avaliable at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.4191

And there's this equation:
##
|φ± \rangle = \frac 1{√2}(|HaHb ± |VaVb\rangle)
##
##
|ψ± \rangle = \frac 1{√2}(|HaVb ± |VaHb\rangle)
##
where ha(vb) represents a horizontally (vertically) polarized photon in spatial mode a (b).

Soooo, I guess what it is saying is:
When photons are entangled, their polarization can be entangled in 4 different ways:
φ+ they have the same "polarization degree" (like vertical and vertical, or horizontal and horizontal) and the same phase (like when one wave is in "Crest" the other will also be in "crest")
φ- they have the same "polarization degree" but opposite phases.
ψ+ they have the opposite "polarization degree" (like horizontal and vertical) and the same phase.
ψ- they have the opposite "polarization degree" and the opposite phase.

And in our BBO cristal we create entangled photons, but we have no clue on what kind of entanglement they have until we measure it.

So far I understood correctly?
Thanks! =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Joao said:
So far I understood correctly?
Yes, that is correct.

For reference, these four basis states are called Bell states and correspond to a two-particle basis in which each state corresponds to an entangled state.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top