Help With Springs: Answers & Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter c31023
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding spring mechanics, specifically the relationship between weight, compression, and lifting power. It clarifies that the spring rate, measured in pounds per inch, determines how much a spring compresses under a given weight. The conversation also addresses the stored energy in a compressed spring and its ability to lift weight upon release, noting that the maximum load it can lift is less than the weight that caused its compression. Additionally, the impact of gravity on vertical versus horizontal spring applications is highlighted, indicating that different conditions affect spring performance. Overall, the thread provides foundational insights into spring dynamics and their practical implications.
c31023
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I think this is in the right section, sorry if it's not. First off, I'll apologize again for not knowing any terminology dealing with springs so I hope you understand what I'm wanting from you. Which is, say you have a circular compression spring that can hold 2 lbs without moving, what amount of weight would it take to compress the spring all the way. Another question I have is, hypothetically if a spring holds 2 lbs without moving and it takes say 50 lbs of weight to compress it all the way, that would mean the spring could provide 2 lbs of lifting power if it were sprung right? Isn't there a ratio to this, like for every 1 lb of support from a spring it takes a certain amount of poundage to compress it? Also what would the unit be for the stored power from a spring lb/ft, or lb/in?
I'd really appreciate it if someone could assist me, thank you. Cory
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What you're looking for is the spring rate. In English units (like you're using above), it is generally listed as pounds per inch.

For example, if I have a 4 inch long compression spring with a spring rate of 4 pounds per inch, and I put a 4 pound weight on top of it, the spring will compress 1 inch, because at 1 inch of compression, the spring will be exerting 4 pounds of force.

Spring theory gets very complex, but that should answer your question.
 
Thank you very much, I've been wondering about this.
 
Bigaggie, in your example of a 4 inch long compression spring that has a spring rate of 4 lbs per inch you put 4 lbs on it and it compressed 1 inch. Say that the 4 inch spring was compressed 1 inch and the spring stayed compressed while the weight was lifted off, then the spring was released, how much weight by way of the stored energy would the spring be capable of lifting for that one inch? I'm assuming it's got to be less than the 4 lbs, right? thanks again cory
 
To clarify, you're scenario is a spring with a rate of 4 lbs per inch compressed one inch, held in place at its compressed state, and then released, and you want to know the maximum load it could move back to its uncompressed state? I will assume that the spring is also acting against gravity.

Theoretically, there is no load that would allow the spring to return to its uncompressed state. For example, if I used a weight of 2 lbs, the spring would have to support that 2 lbs. From Hooke's Law, the spring force is equal to the spring rate multiplied by the amount of deflection (in this case, compression). So with a force of 2 lbs, and a rate of 4 lbs, dividing the two will yield .5 inches. So in theory, any time you put a weight on that spring, it will deflect from its natural state.

Now if you make the spring act in the horizontal, that's a totally different story altogether, because now you're no longer acting against the full weight of the object, simply its inertia and the friction against it. We'd have to be a lot more specific before we could really say what would happen there.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top