Help with textbook question -- Where did the factor of 2 come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Julia Coggins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a textbook problem from "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" regarding the calculation of magnetic field strength around a nichrome wire. The confusion arises from the use of μ/2π instead of μ/4π in the Biot-Savart Law, which is clarified by referencing a preceding example in the text. Participants discuss the evaluation of an integral related to the problem, noting that the integral provided in the text requires limits and the application of l'Hôpital's rule for proper evaluation. There is a consensus that understanding the integral's evaluation is crucial for grasping the magnetic field calculation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reviewing calculus concepts to resolve such issues effectively.
Julia Coggins
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
moved into h/w help, so template is missing
From "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Randall D. Knight page 1006. A 1 m long, 1.0 mm diameter nichrome heater wire is connected to a 12 V battery. Find the magnetic field strength 1 cm away from the wire. This problem is solved in the book, but they calculate the magnetic field with: μ/2π instead of μ/4π that is in the Biot-Savart Law. Everything else in my calculations was correct, so I'm wondering why they used this? The full equation they used is: B=μ/2π(I/d) related from the Biot Savart Law for a current carrying wire B ={μ/4π}{IΔs×r/r^2} the 'r' in the numerator is the direction of r not the magnitude.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you see the preceding example (continued onto the top of page 1006)
where they used Biot-Savart to obtain the equation for B_wire?
 
Reading it now. I don't understand how they evaluated that integral?
 
Julia Coggins said:
I don't understand how they evaluated that integral?
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral(1/sqrt(x^2+d^2)^3,x) (Trig substitution... see step-by-step)
The text gave you the integral to do, then they did the integral (with limits).
Plug in the limits and use l'Hopital's rule... you get "1 - (-1)" = 2
 
Unfortunately I don't have wolfram alpha pro, I do need to brush up on my calc though. Isn't L'hopitals rules dealing with indefinite integrals like this one?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top