Help with Young and Freedman 11.76 Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaceplant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Young
spaceplant
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd think about the free-body diagram for a single beam in that position and angle hanging idly in the air just with the thread.
Then the forces would be the gravity and the tension of the thread
Next, at the hinge the two beams are in a symmetrical configuration and the forces they exert on each other must be symmetrical and at the same time equal and opposite.
Thus follows that the forces are horizontal.

And in reference to the c.m. of one of the beams, the tension of the thread gives a torque in ccw.
Since the crossbar is attached to the midpoint, the only other force that balances the torque is the force at the hinge.
And it follows that the force at the hinge for a beam must act inward.

If you are supposed to neglect the weight of the crossbar , it cannot pull the beams up or down.(think of the symmetrical configuration here again). Thus the direction of the force by the crossbars are also horizontal. And the sign and magnitude are to be determined from the combined equations from all of these.

[edit]
One more thing you can use is that the horizontal forces canel out each other and the crossbar must exert outward force on the beam, equal in magnitude to the force at the hinge. So it must be under compression.

I hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top