nukeman said:
Can you please look at this example:
Write a complete set of quantum numbers for the electrons in Boron?
So Boron is... 1s2 2s2 2p1
1: n=1, L=0, ml=0, ms=+1/2
2: n=1, L=0, ml=0, ms=-1/2
3: n=2, L=?, ml = ? ms = ?
L (switching to your notation) can have any value from 0 up to n-1. So if n=2, L is 0 or 1 (corresponding to the s and p subshells, respectively).
ml is the integers from -L to L, so if you have n=2 and L=0 mL must be 0 (i.e. all integers between 0 and 0, inclusive). ms will always be ± 1/2. This gives us, for the valence electron of boron, either
n=2, L=?, ml = 0 ms = +1/2
or
n=2, L=?, ml = 0 ms = -1/2
Having trouble with 3, because the answer says the L = 0...why? and why does ml = 0? and why does ms = +1/2
For n=3, L can be 0, 1 or 2 (corresponding to the s,p and d subshells, respectively). Since the question asks about the ground state (i.e., the lowest energy) you should start with the s subshell (in other words, 3s
1 ), which is L=1.
I am guessing your text has the convention that you assign +1/2 before -1/2...I don't know if that is a universal convention.
The cool thing about all this is that when
n=1, there is
one L value and there are two sets of the four quantum numbers.
The
first shell of the atom has
one subshell and holds
two electrons.
The
first period of the periodic table has
two elements, and you can argue that He should be above Li based on electron configuration, putting both those elements in
one part of the table.
When
n=2, there are
two values for L there are
8 sets of the four quantum numbers.
The
second shell of the atom has
two subshells and holds
eight electrons.
The
second period of the periodic table has
two sections and
eight elements.
See the pattern emerging? (I tried to use
bold,
italics and
underlining to show the correspondence).