Hi can someone me with couple of my lab questions .

  • Thread starter Thread starter mary_k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple Hi Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab focused on determining the chemical formula of a hydrate, specifically CuSO4.xH2O. Participants address the impact of heating the hydrate too quickly, noting that spattering would lead to a decrease in the calculated percent by mass of water, as some material is lost. This loss would also affect the molecular formula, potentially leading to an inaccurate representation of the hydrate's composition. Additionally, there is confusion about how to determine the molecular formula using provided mass measurements, with emphasis on the need to find the value of x first. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of precise calculations and understanding the effects of experimental errors.
mary_k
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



k so we are doing a lab on determining the chemical formula of a hydrate (CuSO4.xH20) wat i need help on is these following questions:
1. suppose the hydrate was heated too quickly and some of it was lost as it spattered out of the container explain how this would affect
a) the calculated percent by mass of water in the compound.
b) the molecular formual you determined.

wat i think da answer to
1a) wuld bee that mass wuld change because some of solution spattered and since it was heated too quickly da water is not completely evaporated :confused:

and for 1b) da molecular formula wuld change because thur wuld be more water molecules...

nd other question i don't get is that
2.how wuld u determine the molecular formual of CuSO4.xH20
based on this information
Mass of empty beaker or evaporating dish - 185.6g
Mass of beaker or evaporating dish + hydrated copper (II) sulfate. 190.1g
Mass of beaker or evaporating dish + anhydrous copper (II) sulfate. 191.2g

do u hafto find X first :confused: ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow my chemistry is very bad. I can't really help you specifically. But for 1a) simply stating that it changes is not enough. You have to state whether it increase, or decreases, or if it stays the same and why. Would it really change? Think about what it is that you calculated (percent by mass of water in compound).

1b) Again must state how it would change. Why would there be an increase in water molecules when you have less water now?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
109K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top