Hi colleages. is Bernoulli-Euler theory valid in the dynamic analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the Bernoulli-Euler theory in dynamic analysis, specifically regarding the equation M/EI = 1/R, where M is the moment, EI is stiffness, and R is curvature. Participants agree that when M varies with both position (x) and time (t), the curvature must also be expressed as a function of these variables. If the curvature response to the moment is instantaneous, the equation can represent a static condition, but the dynamics of real-world applications suggest there may be a time delay in the beam's response. This complexity indicates that while the equation can be applied, it may not fully capture the dynamics involved. Overall, the discussion highlights the challenges of applying static beam theory to dynamic scenarios.
omarxx84
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
hi colleages. is Bernoulli-Euler theory valid in the dynamic analysis as following:
M/EI=1/R
where,
M= moment
EI=stiffness
R= curvature
is this equation valid when M becomes a function of x and t, as follows:
M(x,t)/EI=1/R
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Dynamics and I never really got along that well, but what you present looks a lot like a beam equation, the deflection (curvature) of a beam as a function of the local bending moment (M), material stiffness (E) and geometry (I), and that is simple enough for me to take a stab at this.

So you are asking if the equation is valid where M varies not just along the length of the beam (x) but while M varies with time (t), is that right?

First, I would say that the curvature must also be expressed as a function of x and t.

Now, if the curvature response (R) to the input M is instantaneous, the answer would be yes, and rather than a dynamics problem, you have an equation expressing the static condition at any given moment in time. A series of static moments as it were.

But I think you are correct to characterize this as a dynamics problem. In the real world I have to think there is a time delay between applying the forces that give rise to the moment and the response of the beam.

At this point in the analysis my head explodes. You will have to take it from there, FWIW.

hth
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top