High energy electron in very deep potential well

blackwater
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why should a high energy electron have to remain in a deep potential well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the electron energy is lower than the well, the electron will remain bound. If you are thinking of the infinite potential well, "high energy" is still less than infinity.
 
Orodruin said:
As long as the electron energy is lower than the well, the electron will remain bound.

What if the electron has an energy above the highest bound-state energy but below the top of the well?
 
king vitamin said:
What if the electron has an energy above the highest bound-state energy but below the top of the well?
It cannot. There is no such eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. It might have such an expectation value for the energy. Then it needs to be in a superposition of bound and scattering states.
 
Why an electron having energy above bound state but below top of the well will have no eigenstate of the Hamiltonian? If it has no such energy eigenstate how can it have energy expectation value?

Please Explain.
 
In order to have a definite energy, a state needs to be an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. There are states which are superpositions of different eigenstates. These states have some probabilities of being in the different eigenstates, meaning that the expectation of the energy does not have to be an energy of an eigenstate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
277
Back
Top