High Energy Lasers: Questions & Answers

AI Thread Summary
High energy lasers can damage optical media at certain field strengths, but high power continuous wave (cw) lasers are operational. Shuttering a high power laser can be achieved using a black anodized aluminum stop, potentially with a heatsink for heat dissipation. It is feasible to combine two laser beams using a polarizing beam splitter, resulting in an unpolarized beam. Success in high power lasers often relies on using mirrors that are highly reflective at the laser frequency to minimize losses. Proper optical surface coatings are crucial, as they typically sustain damage before the optical material itself.
0xDEADBEEF
Messages
815
Reaction score
1
Does someone here know about high energy lasers?

As I understand it, at a certain field strength you damage your optical media, but I know high power cw lasers do exist, so I wonder:

1) How do you shutter a high power laser?
2) Is it possible to join two laser beams. The only way I see would be with a polarizing beam splitter in reverse, but you can only do that once and the medium hast to survive.
3) Is the key to success to tune all your mirrors exactly to the laser frequency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Usually, it's the optical surface coatings that damage before the actual optical material.

Higher power lasers typically use a larger area beam, so that the intensity (power/area) is kept below the damage threshold.

1) lasers can be shuttered with a black anodized aluminum stop, with a heatsink if necessary. The thermal conductivity of aluminum and heatsink would dissapate the heat.

2) Yes, a polarizing beam splitter can combine two beams that are each linearly polarized. The resulting beam will be unpolarized.

3) Mirrors that are highly reflective at the laser frequency are used so that losses are minimal. Mirrors often work over a broad range of wavelengths, eg. "visible", "near ir", etc.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top