Studying Is My High School Math Education Complete with These Books?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a high school student's quest for a rigorous math education in algebra and geometry. The proposed plan includes starting with basic math using Lang's materials, followed by Gelfand's Algebra, Lang's Geometry or Kiselev's Geometry, Gelfand's Trigonometry, and Gelfand and Sullivan's Precalculus. There is a suggestion to consider the Art of Problem Solving (AoPS) books as an excellent resource for strong math students, emphasizing that while classes can complement these materials, they are not essential. The student also questions the relevance of the SMSG books from Yale University, which may be outdated. Overall, the focus is on building a solid and challenging foundation in mathematics.
Prince1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am a high school student and I want to get the most rigorous math education available in algebra and geometry. I was thinking the SMSG books from yale univ, but that may be outdated (they use stuff like "truth sets"). How about this plan:
Starting of with basic math by lang
Algebra by gelfand
Lang's geometry/kiselev geometry
gelfand trigonometry
Gelfand and sullivan's precalculus/"graphs and functions"
Is this enough to give me the strongest, most rigorous background in algebra and geometry? Or should I consider the yale univ SMSG books as well? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to consider Art of Problem Solving books. They are a very good choice for the strongest math students. Classes to go with them if you like, but not at all necessary.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top