High school physics book reccomendation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable physics textbook for high school students preparing for AP Physics, particularly in Mechanics and Electricity and Magnetism. The student seeks a book that complements their upcoming Calculus BC course, emphasizing a desire for a text that simplifies concepts while providing a solid mathematical foundation. Recommendations include "University Physics" and "Physics - Halliday Resnick Kane," both of which are noted for their accessibility to students who have not yet taken calculus. It is highlighted that introductory physics courses typically require minimal calculus, allowing students to grasp fundamental concepts without being overwhelmed by mathematics. The importance of personal preference in choosing a textbook is also mentioned, with a suggestion to explore various books in a library to find the best fit. Additionally, the student expresses a commitment to strengthening their math skills over the summer to better prepare for the challenges ahead.
khalkash
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have already written a thread about a conceptual physics books, which didn't go so well. Instead, I am just looking for one of the best book to accompany me in Physics Mechanics and Electricity and Magnetism. I am in high school and will take Calc BC alongside Physics (pre-calc this year), so my knowledge on calculus based text will be very small in the beginning.

Please recommend me a textbook that is accompanied with problems similar or a bit harder than the rigor of the AP exam. My real goal is to learn and love physics however, so any book that allows me to grasp the concepts easily and allows me to understand the mathematics behind it would be wonderful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Researching a bit, it seems like University Physics is an excellent book and is also used by OCW MITx which I can follow. How would someone who has never taken calculus(but will take it alongside it) respond to this book?
 
Easily. I think you are too concerned about the mathematics required. For an introductory course in physics you use very little calculus. Unless you are using kleppner and kolenkow's book which actually requires thinking.

The majority of students have never taken calculus before taking a first year university [physics] class. They usually take calculus at the same time. Especially books like University physics, physics - Halliday resnick Kane, all the intro textbooks are basically the same. It's all personal preference.

I suggest you go to a library and look through numerous books and make your decision.
 
I have taken a look at both and have access to both. I must say, I love how both books present themselves. The reason I am so math concentrated is because while I was great at math during elementary school, I have seldom paid attention to math in high school. Now I lack a good foundation in it and get nervous when ever I see a mathematics problem. I am rectifying this problem over the summer by going back to the basics and practicing every concept and then moving on. Thank you for your contribution Jimmyly.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top