High school physics book reccomendation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable physics textbook for high school students preparing for AP Physics, particularly in Mechanics and Electricity and Magnetism. The student seeks a book that complements their upcoming Calculus BC course, emphasizing a desire for a text that simplifies concepts while providing a solid mathematical foundation. Recommendations include "University Physics" and "Physics - Halliday Resnick Kane," both of which are noted for their accessibility to students who have not yet taken calculus. It is highlighted that introductory physics courses typically require minimal calculus, allowing students to grasp fundamental concepts without being overwhelmed by mathematics. The importance of personal preference in choosing a textbook is also mentioned, with a suggestion to explore various books in a library to find the best fit. Additionally, the student expresses a commitment to strengthening their math skills over the summer to better prepare for the challenges ahead.
khalkash
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have already written a thread about a conceptual physics books, which didn't go so well. Instead, I am just looking for one of the best book to accompany me in Physics Mechanics and Electricity and Magnetism. I am in high school and will take Calc BC alongside Physics (pre-calc this year), so my knowledge on calculus based text will be very small in the beginning.

Please recommend me a textbook that is accompanied with problems similar or a bit harder than the rigor of the AP exam. My real goal is to learn and love physics however, so any book that allows me to grasp the concepts easily and allows me to understand the mathematics behind it would be wonderful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Researching a bit, it seems like University Physics is an excellent book and is also used by OCW MITx which I can follow. How would someone who has never taken calculus(but will take it alongside it) respond to this book?
 
Easily. I think you are too concerned about the mathematics required. For an introductory course in physics you use very little calculus. Unless you are using kleppner and kolenkow's book which actually requires thinking.

The majority of students have never taken calculus before taking a first year university [physics] class. They usually take calculus at the same time. Especially books like University physics, physics - Halliday resnick Kane, all the intro textbooks are basically the same. It's all personal preference.

I suggest you go to a library and look through numerous books and make your decision.
 
I have taken a look at both and have access to both. I must say, I love how both books present themselves. The reason I am so math concentrated is because while I was great at math during elementary school, I have seldom paid attention to math in high school. Now I lack a good foundation in it and get nervous when ever I see a mathematics problem. I am rectifying this problem over the summer by going back to the basics and practicing every concept and then moving on. Thank you for your contribution Jimmyly.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top